Re: Rumours thread. : Thu May 03, 2012 12:07 pm
Dux wrote: There's a rule in place that a club is entitled to a transfer fee for a young player (I think it's under 24, but it might be under 22) who moves to another club at the end of his contract if they made that player an offer that was a material improvement on his existing contract. The idea was that it would discourage bigger clubs from poaching all of the young talent from across the league. I'm not sure how it would stand up to a legal challenge, though. Cullen confirms that Mullally is leaving and that Widnes will seek compensation http://www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... 6/7725854/? |
Dux wrote: There's a rule in place that a club is entitled to a transfer fee for a young player (I think it's under 24, but it might be under 22) who moves to another club at the end of his contract if they made that player an offer that was a material improvement on his existing contract. The idea was that it would discourage bigger clubs from poaching all of the young talent from across the league. I'm not sure how it would stand up to a legal challenge, though. Cullen confirms that Mullally is leaving and that Widnes will seek compensation http://www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... 6/7725854/? |
|