Re: Lance moving on? : Tue Feb 18, 2014 8:33 pm
Dux wrote:
I can totally understand the argument that we can't justify paying Lance's wage for him to sit on the bench. My worry, though, is that ditching him at this point would be the kind of risk that could end up costing us silverware at a time when we're finally right back in there. I'm not suggesting that Lance is going to win the title for us, of course, but Roby getting injured and us having to play a season without a hooker is the kind of thing that could put us out of contention. If we could line up a decent replacement hooker (not a star but someone better than Howarth) then I'm all for it. If not, then I think it's a risk best avoided.
Lance has been a failure but I don't think it's all his fault and I actually feel sorry for him. He was brought in to play stand off which he can't play. He's tried and put the effort in but he's just not a stand off.
He's now not even making the 17 which IMO is a insult when we've got wello taking the utility role off the bench yet wello can't play in any position other than fullback which he's behind lomax, makinson and swift. Lance can basically cover the back line and hooker.
When he came off the bench at 9 at the back end of last year he was playing well.