Re: Jamie foster : Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:43 pm  

LovesToSpooge wrote:

Would Foster have kicked the conversion today, that Lomax missed?

I would have put good money on Foster nailing that conversion.

Re: Jamie foster : Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:45 pm  

LovesToSpooge wrote:

Would Foster have kicked the conversion today, that Lomax missed?

Possibly. It was right on the touchline though. However, I don't think he'd have scored the try that Ade scored to set up the conversion anyway.

Re: Jamie foster : Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:52 pm  

Dux wrote:

Possibly. It was right on the touchline though. However, I don't think he'd have scored the try that Ade scored to set up the conversion anyway.

Bang on, Foster wouldnt have made the line anyway, great effort by Gardner to score it in the corner.

Re: Jamie foster : Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:20 pm  

Dux wrote:

Possibly. It was right on the touchline though. However, I don't think he'd have scored the try that Ade scored to set up the conversion anyway.

Ahh, OK. I didn't know from where the conversion was being taken from.

Re: Jamie foster : Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:28 pm  

I think it was correct move by saints to play foster in the u20s and I'd leave him there for little while to build some confidence up.

Nobody can say if he'd kicked that goal or scored that try by Ade. It's all it's and buts and I'm sure foz will come back stronger.

Re: Jamie foster : Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:52 pm  

How come Makinson is not taking any flack? Had that been Foster conceding three tries there would have been mayhem on here.

Re: Jamie foster : Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:59 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

How come Makinson is not taking any flack? Had that been Foster conceding three tries there would have been mayhem on here.

Because his name isn't Jamie Foster, he hasn't got a flash haircut/car/pair of boots, he hasn't got a bum for a chin, isn't opening his own hair salon with his dog-grooming mum, doesn't tweet and doesn't say 'reem'.

Re: Jamie foster : Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:01 pm  

Tony Stark wrote:

Because his name isn't Jamie Foster, he hasn't got a flash haircut/car/pair of boots, he hasn't got a bum for a chin, isn't opening his own hair salon with his dog-grooming mum, doesn't tweet and doesn't say 'reem'.

Mind you, Shenny and Makinson were left to defend two on five twice I think? The rest of the team should be taking flak for those tries.

Re: Jamie foster : Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:03 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Can't say 100% but there would have been a significantly higher chance of him doing so yes. He's kicked from the touchline to win the game for us before.

Hang on a minute - didn't he miss three kicks last week?

Re: Jamie foster : Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:04 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

:D

Mind you, Shenny and Makinson were left to defend two on five twice I think? The rest of the team should be taking flak for those tries.

Nah don't be silly! We win as a team, we lose as individuals who make mistakes that cost us the game, that's how it works isn't it?