Sia Soliola : Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:48 pm  

No charge for Sia for the high tackle against Warrington:

'Player attempts to make a legitimate tackle. Tackle is high however attacker is dipping. Initial contact is with the chest. Penalty sufficient.'

Re: Sia Soliola : Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:53 pm  

Seems a fair decision to me, let’s move on.

Re: Sia Soliola : Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:19 pm  

BackrowSaint wrote:

No charge for Sia for the high tackle against Warrington:

'Player attempts to make a legitimate tackle. Tackle is high however attacker is dipping. Initial contact is with the chest. Penalty sufficient.'

Jesus, it looks like we're all getting a pass in round 1!

Re: Sia Soliola : Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:24 pm  

Elima facing a 5 game ban though, not seen the incident yet. Was it bad?

Re: Sia Soliola : Mon Feb 17, 2014 6:11 pm  

I am sorry but these RFL decisions are becoming bizaare. Is anything worthy of a suspension any more?

I am not sure we need to move back to the days of 8 game bans for mistimed high tackles, but Soliola should have seen red. Let alone be exonerated after the game!

Re: Sia Soliola : Mon Feb 17, 2014 6:14 pm  

Monaghan should of shown more respect and passed the ball, Nobody runs straight at Sia! Lesson learned, move on.

Re: Sia Soliola : Mon Feb 17, 2014 6:50 pm  

Well at least they are consistent.

Re: Sia Soliola : Mon Feb 17, 2014 7:01 pm  

Maybe they are showing more tolerance for when Masoe makes his first appearance.

Re: Sia Soliola : Mon Feb 17, 2014 7:12 pm  

Judder Man wrote:

Maybe they are showing more tolerance for when Masoe makes his first appearance.

I would have given a red, or one match, but looks like everyone gets a bye on round 1.

Re: Sia Soliola : Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:28 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

:lol:



I would have given a red, or one match, but looks like everyone gets a bye on round 1.

They had no option after letting the little fatty from Wigan off last week.