bewareshadows wrote:
I don't think people knew one way or the other and from the article neither did Luke until recently. People did not want it to be career ending they just feared it maybe given other injuries they had seen in the past.
Good to know the lad still had the chance to play again.
Like I said at the time, he DID break his leg and DID dislocate his ankle and he DID do ligament damage.
And I was also correct when I said they feared he'd never play again.
I've spoke to Walsh recently and he doesn't expect to be back playing for a minimum of 6 month and possibly up to 9 month.