darnoc wrote:
I think that everyone who was posting on that board at that time remembers your little notebook thing.
Like you can remember which team you support? Have you remembered yet?
Just to refresh your memory, you were obscenely bitter about Saints and felt that they
got away with a lot. You then tried to prove this by making notes when you was at a pub watching a match. The post you made was literally 3 mins 25 seconds Cunnigham high tackle with no penalty.....4mins 15 seconds, Hooper late hit on kicker no penalty etc etc.
No notebook or bitterness involved, though. It was a balanced analysis of the game, and entirely accurate.
I dont actually know what was funnier, the fact that you were sad enough to do this
COMMITTED enough to do this, like any good journalist or statistician. Or do you think the bods at OPTA are "sad" too? Ever used a stat in a discussion?
or the fact that you thought by writing this information down then it could no longer be biased and must be the truth. You then backtracked on this pub and notebook malarkey pretending it was all one big jape once you were (rightfully) ridiculed.
I only write the truth, and never backtracked. Is there no start to your intelligence? And like I said... no notebooks involved whatsoever.
and no, you are not correct on who you think I am.
It was a wild guess based on your user name. I'm guessing your poor efforts at trolling and childish insults have earned you bans in the past, so you've set up a new username.
Gurus_Beard wrote:
Despite the appalling use of English, I do believe Sir, you have just ridden
Fishta like Seabiscuit
Pah. Hardly.
tigertot wrote:
Careful, he's got a gun.
No guns. Just wits.