: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:35 pm  

Bullpower wrote:

Wouldn't it be awful if, given that he has a contract with them, El Presidente was having to pay his wages. . . . ?

Unlucky for you that he isn't then isnt it

Bullpower wrote:

Given that the NRL have blocked his playing over there because of that contract I suspect that any restrictions on Mr Eastwood would, for the good of the game and to show SL in the correct light, mean that he is being financially backed/supported by said Presidente

Had the said player not withheld information from the Leeds club when negotiating the contract then you may have a point. However, he failed to mention something that could affect his ability to turn out for the club and as such the blame lays fairly and squarely at the players door.

Feel free to keep clutching at any straw that may bring you closer to Leeds on a financial level though.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:38 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

Feel free to keep clutching at any straw that may bring you closer to Leeds on a financial level though.

Go Steady mate, The Bulls are going up in the world. They now have Bulls merchandise in 2 ASDA stores Nationwide. Today it may be ASDA...tomorrow...............Who knows???? Failing that they can always take players to tribunals....Oh....Wait????

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:23 pm  

SDB wrote:

Go Steady mate, The Bulls are going up in the world. They now have Bulls merchandise in 2 ASDA stores Nationwide. Today it may be ASDA...tomorrow...............Who knows???? Failing that they can always take players to tribunals....Oh....Wait????

If wit was sh*t, you'd be constipated.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:43 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

Feel free to keep clutching at any straw that may bring you closer to Leeds on a financial level though.

Feel free to keep clutching at any straw that may bring you closer to Bradford in overall Success.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:28 pm  

That was a successful fishing trip BP!

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:24 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

Unlucky for you that he isn't then isnt it

Unlucky? How so? I don't see why anyone would think it unlucky for me that this wasn't the case . . . . .

King Monkey wrote:

Had the said player not withheld information from the Leeds club when negotiating the contract then you may have a point. However, he failed to mention something that could affect his ability to turn out for the club and as such the blame lays fairly and squarely at the players door.

That's shocking You'd imagine that Mr Hetherington would never want person of this calibre playing at his club.

King Monkey wrote:

Feel free to keep clutching at any straw that may bring you closer to Leeds on a financial level though.

I see no, nor did I elude to any, straw clutching. But thanks for your comments anyway

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:25 pm  

Bully_Boxer wrote:

That was a successful fishing trip BP!

I shall ban myself immediately for 24 hrs.

Sorry . . . . . I've had a bad week . . . .

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:31 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

Feel free to keep clutching at any straw that may bring you closer to Bradford in overall Success.

I see you havent been over to the Leeds board since our regular statistician OWNED you.

Leeds 41 trophies Bradford 34.

You need to go back and apologise.