Re: New CEO? : Fri Sep 27, 2013 8:35 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Beefy clearly had heard that there was going to be a new CEO. And so there is. He asked if anyone knew, and I said yes, and he's a Kiwi. Not meany people knew or suspected that we were on the point of any major change.

In an unconnected turn of events, one of the Bulls' new owners, Mark Moore, has just appointed Robbie Paul as the new CEO.

I thought that was just coincidence, as the theme of the day was roger and his sworn to secrecy Kiwi centre. If not, well played, if so, turned out ok.

And I guess we'll never know...

Re: New CEO? : Fri Sep 27, 2013 8:50 am  

M@islebugs wrote:

These posts are purposely intended to damage the club and its efforts to rebuild.

There are some sad, bitter people who post on here. There are those, partly on the wind up, who post some uncomfortable information. But I don't think I am aware of any poster seeking to damage the club. Banning posters or deleting is not the way; that's what happens on the Wigan board if you post something not supportive of the club. There are enough brains on here to show up the occasional troll.

Re: New CEO? : Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:19 am  

tigertot wrote:

There are some sad, bitter people who post on here. There are those, partly on the wind up, who post some uncomfortable information. But I don't think I am aware of any poster seeking to damage the club. Banning posters or deleting is not the way; that's what happens on the Wigan board if you post something not supportive of the club. There are enough brains on here to show up the occasional troll.

I'm pretty sure Gutter et al are definitely hoping to damage the club, and gleefully so. The thesis is the people who're involved in the club are in some way duplicitous. It's clearly considered to undermine confidence and stir suspicion/cynicism.
It's all a bit weird tbh.

On banning and deleting I agree but it often falls to proper posters to prove the negative and polite notes could be offered after a couple of posts to present reasonable evidence or stop. Whitcut and Moore aren't barrow boys and neither have been disqualified as directors, convicted of anything. It's inappropriate and slightly pathetic rather than 'ban' worthy.

Re: New CEO? : Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:52 pm  

M@islebugs wrote:

I'm pretty sure Gutter et al are definitely hoping to damage the club, and gleefully so. The thesis is the people who're involved in the club are in some way duplicitous. It's clearly considered to undermine confidence and stir suspicion/cynicism.
It's all a bit weird tbh.

On banning and deleting I agree but it often falls to proper posters to prove the negative and polite notes could be offered after a couple of posts to present reasonable evidence or stop. Whitcut and Moore aren't barrow boys and neither have been disqualified as directors, convicted of anything. It's inappropriate and slightly pathetic rather than 'ban' worthy.

IMHO some of the remarks sail dangerously into libel waters.