Re: So who is leaving : Fri Oct 25, 2019 4:21 pm  

JUDGE666 wrote:

As this is who is leaving thread, Flanagan isn't - signed up for next season

Apologies, I got derailed because a lot of this” I know something you don’t know” is getting annoying and damaging.

As for George, I know he splits opinion and he does some VERY stupid things but a player like him is needed when you’re relying on young players in the championship as we may well end up doing. I.e. a bit of old school biff to protect them

Re: So who is leaving : Fri Oct 25, 2019 4:30 pm  

HAPEtobehere wrote:

Apologies, I got derailed because a lot of this” I know something you don’t know” is getting annoying and damaging.

As for George, I know he splits opinion and he does some VERY stupid things but a player like him is needed when you’re relying on young players in the championship as we may well end up doing. I.e. a bit of old school biff to protect them

Totally agree, just needs to use his noggin a bit sometimes!

Re: So who is leaving : Fri Oct 25, 2019 4:37 pm  

Perhaps not his noggin as that would attract another ban!! now if there was something between the ears.....but good news I think.

Re: So who is leaving : Fri Oct 25, 2019 4:44 pm  

HAPEtobehere wrote:

Answer me this, whilst you’re contacting creditors and hiding in the shadows with your imaginary consortium, why didn’t you put a public bid in and force the rfls hand? Is it because you:
A) are full of bulls hit?
B) we’re looking for a club that went bankrupt so you could pick the bones yourself?
C) it’s definitely A

Look mate, may be just point out the following:

If you had taken in what we have been saying time and time and time and time and time and time again, the RFL are the #1 problem.

As things stand we would not launch a bid to force the RFL's hand (as you put it) . Why?

Because they (i.e. the Rugby Football Limpets) first need root and branch reform and new blood themselves. The process relating thereto is complicated, but the wheels are in motion, albeit NOT in public view.

Thereafter, we will be stepping in, and hopefully there is still something left to 'acquire'.

If, however, you'd prefer to ignore us then do so. We would not lose any sleep over it.

BTW - You (and we) are putting these posts in a thread which refers to 'who is leaving'. The posts should have been cited in the Takeover thread and for that we should both apologise for temporarily hijacking this excellent thread.

Re: So who is leaving : Fri Oct 25, 2019 4:49 pm  

nestegg wrote:

Look mate, may be just point out the following:

If you had taken in what we have been saying time and time and time and time and time and time again, the RFL are the #1 problem.

As things stand we would not launch a bid to force the RFL's hand (as you put it) . Why?

Because they (i.e. the Rugby Football Limpets) first need root and branch reform and new blood themselves. The process relating thereto is complicated, but the wheels are in motion, albeit NOT in public view.

Thereafter, we will be stepping in, and hopefully there is still something left to 'acquire'.

If, however, you'd prefer to ignore us then do so. We would not lose any sleep over it.

BTW - You (and we) are putting these posts in a thread which refers to 'who is leaving'. The posts should have been cited in the Takeover thread and for that we should both apologise for temporarily hijacking this excellent thread.

Try the ownership thread for this

Re: So who is leaving : Fri Oct 25, 2019 4:52 pm  

nestegg wrote:

Look mate, may be just point out the following:

If you had taken in what we have been saying time and time and time and time and time and time again, the RFL are the #1 problem.

As things stand we would not launch a bid to force the RFL's hand (as you put it) . Why?

Because they (i.e. the Rugby Football Limpets) first need root and branch reform and new blood themselves. The process relating thereto is complicated, but the wheels are in motion, albeit NOT in public view.

Thereafter, we will be stepping in, and hopefully there is still something left to 'acquire'.

If, however, you'd prefer to ignore us then do so. We would not lose any sleep over it.

BTW - You (and we) are putting these posts in a thread which refers to 'who is leaving'. The posts should have been cited in the Takeover thread and for that we should both apologise for temporarily hijacking this excellent thread.

I’ve already apologised mind so we just wait for one of yours again

Re: So who is leaving : Fri Oct 25, 2019 5:07 pm  

Bendybulls wrote:

Perhaps not his noggin as that would attract another ban!! now if there was something between the ears.....but good news I think.

Unfortunately the first thing I thought of too. He can be a difference maker in some games when he’s off the bench

Re: So who is leaving : Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:14 am  

And Hallas isn't leaving either! Good news!