Fit and proper person ? : Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:24 am  

Forgive me if this has been covered before, but through-out all this turmoil and talk of more points deduction etc.. shouldnt the RFL be held accountable for some of this mess ? Last time we were in administration there were other bidders out there who wanted the club, who must have been deemed by the RFL less fit and proper than Mark Green, ie Mrs K & Mr Lamb to name but two... The RFL did their homework and chose whats turned out to be the least equipped to own our beloved club and now we are in this mess again... Seems the RFL should apologising to us for their poor judgement not looking for ways to punish us. or am i missing something ?

Re: Fit and proper person ? : Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:26 am  

Not being funny but how can we say he was the least equipped? Agreed it didn't work but hindsight and all that! He said all the right things at the start did Green

Re: Fit and proper person ? : Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:49 am  

They failed Ryan Whitcut so it does work sometimes...

Re: Fit and proper person ? : Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:57 am  

Bets'y Bulls wrote:

Not being funny but how can we say he was the least equipped? Agreed it didn't work but hindsight and all that! He said all the right things at the start did Green

But thats exactly my point, wasnt it their job to investigate and make sure the successful candidate had all the right tools for the job not just be able to talk the talk....

Re: Fit and proper person ? : Mon Nov 21, 2016 8:07 am  

Its a bit like interviewing for a job or getting married isn't it? Sometimes everything seems great and then it goes wrong later

Re: Fit and proper person ? : Mon Nov 21, 2016 8:11 am  

The RFL had nothing to do with the failed Mrs K bid the administrator turned it down it never got to the RFL. As for Lamb he's a chancer was told to provide proof of founds couldn't do it.

Re: Fit and proper person ? : Mon Nov 21, 2016 8:25 am  

redeverready wrote:

The RFL had nothing to do with the failed Mrs K bid the administrator turned it down it never got to the RFL. As for Lamb he's a chancer was told to provide proof of founds couldn't do it.

Which is why I personally hope neither of them gets it this time around. Both full of $hit, just in a different sense. Need someone a lot more sensible.

I'd be interested to hear who the other parties are apart from the heavily rumoured Lawn, Lamb & Koukash.

Re: Fit and proper person ? : Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:15 am  

HamsterChops wrote:

They failed Ryan Whitcut so it does work sometimes...

Now running a pub. Brewery thought he was alright...

He's doing rather well actually.

Re: Fit and proper person ? : Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:29 am  

How many of you on here have little white lies on their CV, or have embellished facts in an interview..............I rest my case. The RFL did all they could feasibly do.

Re: Fit and proper person ? : Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:37 am  

Surely not wrote:

He's doing rather well actually.

If you say so Ryan.