Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:43 am  

According to Companies House, on 17/1/17 a document was filed by the administrator, confirming that this charge has been satisfied "in full".

Has anybody got a clue what is going on?

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:50 am  

Points 5.1 - 5.9 in the administrators report sort of cover it, but as some of it is sub-judice, is intentionally light on detail.
Judge gave directions in High court on 21st November.

[Bullseye]

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:52 am  

Must confess I haven't a clue what any of this means.

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:52 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

According to Companies House, on 17/1/17 a document was filed by the administrator, confirming that this charge has been satisfied "in full".

Has anybody got a clue what is going on?

I bloody hope he hasn't got a penny back.

[Bullseye]

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:54 am  

Does this mean our dynamic duo bought the club out of admin?

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:55 am  

There's a summary by Adey on total rl, as much as is legally prudent I think.

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 12:00 pm  

Petitt still thinks the club is in admin, as the liquidation papers haven't been filed.
Thorne bought some of the IP from him.
Petitt says:
8.6 - Immediately after the (enforced ) decision to cease trading.....snip.... the RFL released a statement inviting any interested party to consider starting a new business.....
8.7 - Outside of this (unauthorised) action by the RFL, the administrators have also received 7 expressions of interest to acquire some or all of the business assets. Heads of terms have been agreed with one party...... which will be reported to creditors in due course.

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 12:25 pm  

i don't know what any of this means!!!!!!

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 12:28 pm  

ouch, Unauthorised action by the RFL...

But wait.... as the creditor is satisfied, after a fashion, does this mean that throwing £50k (IIRC) the RFL said were debts needed to be paid, at the creditors will allow Kim Jong (Pie-faced Shonny) to appeal the 12 points to a more manageable 6?

As if it couldn't get any more farcical.

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:10 pm  

So, hang on, if the administrator now sells the 'club' you will have two clubs and the original club if someone so wished could apply for membership of the RFL starting in Champ 1. Oh what a tangled web we weave.

Administrator still has old club. Thorne bought up some of the assets including the Bulls name. Chalmers is starting a brand new club that maybe can't use the Bulls moniker, the second named director of Chalmers new company is a NZ rugby league club who finished bottom of the NZ league last year and who were going to apply for a SL franchise in 2007.