af wrote:
Wouldn't he also be a better buy for us than other clubs because he's a Bradford product and therefore counts towards the quota of homegrown players? What is that quota btw? Did I dream it?
yeah that would count in our favour to a point. Below is something I cribed off google last year so it could well be wrong in the fine detail but it gets the main ideas across. (IE dont anyone bother picking up all the faults with the exact details - its an illustration only - Anyone got a more accurate up to date version of the rules?) The home grown player rule increasing year on year is where signing Fielden would be better for us than signing an equally skilled aussie but it still might not be as useful in the long run as introducing another young current academy player from our books if there are any good enough to step up.
2008 each club is allowed -
At least 5 home grown players.
No more that 5 overseas quota players.
No more than 10 overseas trained players inc the 5 quota players.
Rest of the squad to be from players trained within the same federation.
2009
At least 6 home grown players.
No more than 5 overseas quota players.
No more than 8 overseas trained players inc quota players.
Rest of squad to be from players trained within same federation.
2010
At least 7 home grown players.
No more than 5 quota players.
No more that 6 overseas trained players inc quota players.
Rest of squad to be from players trained within same federation.
2011
At least 8 home grown players.
No more than 5 quota players.
No more than 5 overseas trained players inc quota players.
Rest of squad to be from players trained within same federation.