Re: £300,000 extra for clubs : Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:36 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

It also might be worth pointing out that that the same bar-stewards are paying the wages of all of the players (not sold) at the Bulls this month so perhaps som e good grace is in order.
I'm not the biggest fan of the baffoons at Red Hall but from what i can see they could have not bothered to do that and leave it to the administrator to settle?
I'm trying to look from an objective POV to see if the RFL are being good or bad towards the Bulls and i honestly can't make up my mind, at times they have gone out of their way to support the Bulls over the last couple of years, and on others (more recently) they seem to be unfairly hamstringing the club in regards to re-righting the ship so to speak in particular.
I dont know if this is because they are a reactionary group, often without a clue and making it up on the hoof, one mistake after another and the latter always calling into question the former or whether this is an attempt at either even handedness or righting the former wrongs, as i said i really can't fathom it.
The management of the game from the top right down (minusing a couple of clubs) is a pantomime anyway, i am just having trouble making up my mind as to whether this is a pantomime of its own or just a scene from the RFLs grand production.
I feel for the fans.

Are RFL pay their wages?? or using this £300k?? I believe the monthly wage bill was approximately £200k before Sammut, Carvell, Scruton left... suppose you can add Winterstien and Heath maybe even Bateman to that?? would say the RFL have a good couple of months wages from there...

Sounds crazy I know... BUT we have learnt anything is possible!

Re: £300,000 extra for clubs : Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:44 pm  

melly88 wrote:

Are RFL pay their wages?? or using this £300k?? I believe the monthly wage bill was approximately £200k before Sammut, Carvell, Scruton left... suppose you can add Winterstien and Heath to that maybe even Bateman to that?? would say the RFL have a good couple of months wages from that...

Sounds crazy I know... BUT we have learnt anything is possible!

Of that there is little doubt!!

Re: £300,000 extra for clubs : Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:49 pm  

The RFL do not like the Bulls, they a desperate to see them relegated and finally playing as part timers. Bulls in name but not in stature. All the time saying "it's not us", "we're doing the best for the club" etc. etc.. The RFL used the Hood loan/lease fiasco to start driving in the first nails, selling to OK - more nails, letting other clubs tap up players, the list is endless.

[Bulliac]

Re: £300,000 extra for clubs : Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:50 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

It also might be worth pointing out that that the same bar-stewards are paying the wages of all of the players (not sold) at the Bulls this month so perhaps som e good grace is in order.
I'm not the biggest fan of the baffoons at Red Hall but from what i can see they could have not bothered to do that and leave it to the administrator to settle?
I'm trying to look from an objective POV to see if the RFL are being good or bad towards the Bulls and i honestly can't make up my mind, at times they have gone out of their way to support the Bulls over the last couple of years, and on others (more recently) they seem to be unfairly hamstringing the club in regards to re-righting the ship so to speak in particular.
I dont know if this is because they are a reactionary group, often without a clue and making it up on the hoof, one mistake after another and the latter always calling into question the former or whether this is an attempt at either even handedness or righting the former wrongs, as i said i really can't fathom it.
The management of the game from the top right down (minusing a couple of clubs) is a pantomime anyway, i am just having trouble making up my mind as to whether this is a pantomime of its own or just a scene from the RFLs grand production.
I feel for the fans.

They will be paying nothing. Neither will the RFL, responsibility for running things is down to the administrator. I could be more 'gracious' towards them but why should I. They are a set of buffoons and I hope they [personally]have to pay out to Moore et al. It would serve them right.

Re: £300,000 extra for clubs : Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:57 pm  

Couldn't agree more Bulliac

Re: £300,000 extra for clubs : Mon Mar 03, 2014 2:57 pm  

Please can the people suggesting RFL are paying the clubs wages provide evidence of this?

Re: £300,000 extra for clubs : Mon Mar 03, 2014 3:10 pm  

I have asked that on more than one occasion and I'm still waiting on any proof

Re: £300,000 extra for clubs : Mon Mar 03, 2014 3:24 pm  

roger daly wrote:

I have asked that on more than one occasion and I'm still waiting on any proof

Is it even legal?

Re: £300,000 extra for clubs : Mon Mar 03, 2014 9:00 pm  

But they know it as fact cos they heard it from a man down the pub, who heard it from their uncle friends cousins roommate who is one of heads at the RFL, make of that what you will.

Re: £300,000 extra for clubs : Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:39 am  

99% of what has gone on between the Bulls owners (various) and the RFL has gone un written over the last few years, either initially or until something else has led for a need for it to be disclosed.
I can asure you it is true, and it was not a knock at the Bulls or strangely (for me) a knock at the RFL, just a bit of reality.