Re: Peter Hood Q&A Thread : Wed Dec 09, 2015 12:57 pm  

If it is indeed the real Mr Hood, he has proved himself to be like a politician himself insofar as not answering questions either directly or at all!

[Bulliac]

Re: Peter Hood Q&A Thread : Wed Dec 09, 2015 1:49 pm  

Agreed, and it's annoying 'cos I'm really wanting to know about the suits coming from Greenwoods. Has he mentioned it? Has he heck - we need a journalist to get involved and to and ask some real searching questions!

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Peter Hood Q&A Thread : Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:04 pm  

My question to the Hood is "Which Thunderbird most annoyed you and why". I'd also like to know what you get when you add together: A. the opposite of No B. A type of metal traditionally used to can food C. The surname of famous Marshal of the Royal Air Force known as 'bomber'. And finally, what facts would Peter like adding to his rather brief Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hood

My question to the Hood is "Which Thunderbird most annoyed you and why". I'd also like to know what you get when you add together: A. the opposite of No B. A type of metal traditionally used to can food C. The surname of famous Marshal of the Royal Air Force known as 'bomber'. And finally, what facts would Peter like adding to his rather brief Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hood

Re: Peter Hood Q&A Thread : Wed Dec 09, 2015 4:48 pm  

My question is, are you in the new Thunderbirds movie, and why in those programmes do you look more like Stevo?

Re: Peter Hood Q&A Thread : Wed Dec 09, 2015 5:59 pm  

My question would be whether he thinks that the development of the team would be secondary if Mr Green obtains the freehold of Odsal.

Re: Peter Hood Q&A Thread : Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:40 pm  

roger daly wrote:

By which time Harris was a Bulls player, was his intentions to step down connected to what was going to happen

You know the answer to this Chris. Foundations upon which the club was built with nothing more than quicksand.

Re: Peter Hood Q&A Thread : Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:54 pm  

Peter Hood wrote:

You know the answer to this Chris. Foundations upon which the club was built with nothing more than quicksand.

Yes agreed

With the benefit of hindsight Peter, what do you think could of been done differently after Caisley left?

Re: Peter Hood Q&A Thread : Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:59 pm  

cut the overheads and the team even quicker, sold the silver and bought some copper. moved to VP whilst still putting money into the academy. Put Mac in an ageing machine so that in 5 seconds he came out with the experience of beating the ABs over 3 tests.

Re: Peter Hood Q&A Thread : Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:42 am  

So who decided to give the keys of the hen run to the fox by selling our home? That wasn't Chris Caisley was it? The fans at Odsal were really proud that we got the Stadium back and were staggered when you sold it for peanuts .

Re: Peter Hood Q&A Thread : Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:04 am  

Peter Hood wrote:

You know the answer to this Chris. Foundations upon which the club was built with nothing more than quicksand.

So this quicksand was OK for you to stand in over all the years from 1996 when you were the vice chair of the sinking ship. And unlike the fact of your tenure the democracy was in place under Caisley's regime because we had a full board of directors who presumably were in favour of our club being the iconic growth of Super League at Odsal?