nestegg wrote:
Having re-read the predominantly utter tosh in yesterday's League Express re the Bulls we have four additional open messages to Nigel Wood (and of course his family and PA's etc), Eric Perez and Mark (why ever did I allow Chalmers to allegedly owe me a high five figure gambling related debt) Sawyer:
1) We do not for one second belief that Andrew Chalmers owed a substantial debt (if any) to BB17 - if the 5B Ltd wants to build up a modicum of trust and truly be open and transparent then prove it, inc specific evidence of how such a debt (assuming it did ever exist) accrued.
2) If the 5B's want to be even more open and transparent then post ALL fans questions and your answers on to an open public board for all fans to see.
3) To say that previous Bulls' owners were non rugby League people may be right, but let's not forget who put them in place, and deemed them to be fit and proper persons - Nigel Wood and the RFL. So are you having a laugh Eric? Do you, Nigel and Mark think us fans are gullible.
4) Last, but not least, the reference to a £30k saving for each Dewsbury based home game when compared to Odsal outgoings is disdainful spin, and you know it is Eric. One simple example of why your figures (of figures given to you by Wood and Sawyer) are wrong is as follows. There will in all likelihood be on average say up to 1000 less fans per 'home' game in 2020 when compared to last season. At an average (overpriced0 matchday gate price of say £22 (allowing for some concessions etc) then 1000 x £22 = £22K. Add on to that the shortfall in matchday income for beer and hard boiled burgers etc then your average savings will soon dwindle to zilch. So why not just tell the RFL to spend the £75K needed to re-open the doors to Odsal and Bring the Bulls Back to Bradford immediately; simple. Why won't Wood, Sawyer, Chalmers, and the RFL sanction that?
We challenge you to answer the above.
I can't answer that. I don't think anyone on the forum can answer that. Try responding to them in person, not anonymously on a forum (which in all probability isn't read by any of them anyway) and then if they do reply then, by all means, post it up here.
Doing things like this just makes you look even more tenuous and ridiculous than you already do.
Actions speak louder than words, and all any of us have seen at the moment are you peddling cobblers on a forum. You've done this and seen these people. Lets see some evidence that what you say is right.
Until you have something to say which can be backed up by fact, facts that can be shared, I would just leave it be. At the moment, even if you are what you say you are, you're making no friends here.
If in the future (by some miracle), you WERE in charge of the Bulls I fear that the things you have said on here will come back and haunt you. I'm not sure I would give my support behind a group that accuses posters of being drunk because they have a pop at your sub-x-files conspiracy b0ll0cks.
To paraphrase: You're making no friends here, and if you want my support then shut up until you can come back with some cold hard facts to back up the meetings, accusations and figures you are presenting.