Nobody went at scrum half, that's our big problem. We'll never get anywhere unless we solve it. People fill in as best they can, but that's it. OTOH to get the team we had to perform like it did against Leigh was a monumental credit to Smith's coaching ability. It was obvious that the players believed. You can't buy that, and it puts a whole different complexion on the remainder of the season.
You can complain about limited attacking ploys but given Smith has no 7, and then lost our best creative player, Gaskell, for the big game, he worked miracles to achieve us matching Leigh for tries.
And I know there is a big connection between confidence/belief and good defence, but it was remarkable how much of a turnaround there has been in such a short time in our defensive patterns. Both teams displayed some excellent and tenacious defence.
I had been dreading what Leigh would do to us for weeks, which was weird given the sort of players we have, but the way they had been playing ... Yet Smith had us back in some shape, looking like we can actually play the game.
I am surprised FA has not noticed the typo (or is it a brain fart rather than a typo as neither option make sense!) in the Bulls website article "Smith Proud of Bash Performance". Its either an empathic or an emphatic oversight by the Headmaster of RAB Grammar old Skool. On balance empathic aint his thaaang, so emphatic it is.
And Rohan should be, when you consider what he had to choose from. In the circumstances we were in, a change was needed, and Rohan is not just a perfunctory change of coach, he has got a big buy-in from the squad. What he could do with a fully fit and complete squad is a mouth watering prospect.
I was really impressed and proud of the team yesterday.
I thought the forwards actually performed better than Leigh. I think the total meters made during the game had the Bulls 200 meters ahead.
The only time I was dissapointed was when the Bulls were within 20m of the Leigh line. I never had any confidence that we could shift the ball well enough to get over the try line. With a recognised 6 & 7 in that team, we should be able to push on to a much higher level.
During the game, I couldn't help but feel that Leigh were not performing at the same level in which they played last year. I thought their game has dropped, and they were playing more at out level.
Personally, i'm full of enthusiasm for where the team goes from here. I have no doubt that we can make it into the top 4, but even on yesterdays showing, I still think both Leigh and Bradford are some way off the pace of Leeds, Huddersfield, Hull KR and Salford.
As mentioned by numerous posters, the current format of the game (promotion/relegation) means that any team in the championship is hugely handicapped in what they can offer to the middle 8's.
After one game, I suspect Smith will be that rare thing, like Peter Fox, someone that can make a team play much better than people would have suspected it could from its individual parts.
I was really impressed and proud of the team yesterday.
I thought the forwards actually performed better than Leigh. I think the total meters made during the game had the Bulls 200 meters ahead.
The only time I was dissapointed was when the Bulls were within 20m of the Leigh line. I never had any confidence that we could shift the ball well enough to get over the try line. With a recognised 6 & 7 in that team, we should be able to push on to a much higher level.
During the game, I couldn't help but feel that Leigh were not performing at the same level in which they played last year. I thought their game has dropped, and they were playing more at out level.
Personally, i'm full of enthusiasm for where the team goes from here. I have no doubt that we can make it into the top 4, but even on yesterdays showing, I still think both Leigh and Bradford are some way off the pace of Leeds, Huddersfield, Hull KR and Salford.
As mentioned by numerous posters, the current format of the game (promotion/relegation) means that any team in the championship is hugely handicapped in what they can offer to the middle 8's.
I agree with you there. We are way off last year's pace, in the way we were playing the game - although we were well and truly found out, using that 'style' in the Qualifiers. Ironically, our forwards are better than last year - the first 65 minutes at Odsal were typical of how they have performed. Yesterday, they didn't take anything out of your pack though, and your 'metres gained' stats prove what we believed to be the case - that you were making more ground than us. Our backs (who were so good last season) are struggling this time around. We are missing McNally, big time, despite having a good deputy in Lee Smith. Also without McNally and Brierley, our pace has gone. Half back has been a problem, firstly with Brierley's ill-timed departure, and then with Chase's 'will he play, won't he play' farce. We are definitely a better team with Ridyard in it, although Drinkwater made three huge contributions yesterday. He should improve, when he gets used to our plays. I also reckon Reynolds is a more rounded player than Brierley was.
If I were a Bradford fan, I would be very optimistic about the rest of the season. There was a lot more enthusiasm about your play yesterday and you were much better organised. If you do find a good organising half back, and get Gaskell and others back to fitness, I wouldn't be overly optimistic about our chances against you - providing you can maintain yesterday's levels. Mind you, we still have McNally, Tonga, (if he ever does play!) Ridyard, Moimoi, Dixon and Patterson to come back - plus maybe even Beswick and Barlow too - so perhaps we still have some improvement in us? We'll also have a much rested Hock, Acton and Higham to return after lengthy enforced absences, following this week's Disciplinary meeting!
We do need one Championship team to get through the Qualifiers this time!
After one game, I suspect Smith will be that rare thing, like Peter Fox, someone that can make a team play much better than people would have suspected it could from its individual parts.
With just one caveat - and that is, that it's [relatively] easy to do that as the new broom and sustaining it, which is the key, is a little more difficult.
If it carries on though, I may find myself being enthused and not just turning up from habit! Smithy is beginning to look like the real deal though and that's all he can do, this early in his reign.
With just one caveat - and that is, that it's [relatively] easy to do that as the new broom and sustaining it, which is the key, is a little more difficult.
If it carries on though, I may find myself being enthused and not just turning up from habit! Smithy is beginning to look like the real deal though and that's all he can do, this early in his reign.
If there's one thing I've learned over the years, caveats are useless. If there's another, so is damning with faint praise.
I should think most went to Blackpool with trepidation as to what would happen, especially once we saw the squad, and I for one am not going to make the mistake of dismissing that performance as "relatively easy" for him to have masterminded. I don't think it was, not at all.
Sustaining it is not the key, having that rare ability to raise the level of performance that much in the first place is the key. All of a sudden, we looked like a team that is coached, with a game plan.
If there's one thing I've learned over the years, caveats are useless. If there's another, so is damning with faint praise.
I should think most went to Blackpool with trepidation as to what would happen, especially once we saw the squad, and I for one am not going to make the mistake of dismissing that performance as "relatively easy" for him to have masterminded. I don't think it was, not at all.
Sustaining it is not the key, having that rare ability to raise the level of performance that much in the first place is the key. All of a sudden, we looked like a team that is coached, with a game plan.
Lol. One thing I've leaned over the years is that there are always caveats.... and who is damming with faint praise?
As I said, I was pleased, in fact, more than pleased not only with the performance but also with the result which was much better than anticipated. I'd suspect that everyone putting in an extra effort to impress a new boss was pretty normal human behaviour, in any walk of life, to be honest, but then such observations can always pass people by. That isn't to denigrate - or damm with faint praise - anything, btw, just saying how I've noticed, through a lifetime, that things tend to be.
For sure, having that ability too get the best from each individual and to mould them, Peter Fox like, into a solid team is a great asset, but maintaining performance levels over a period is absolutely the key and is how any coach or manager is ultimately judged. Results, like the names on the teamsheet, can [and will] come and go over time and the 'new' boss will become part and parcel of the squad's daily life, so keeping some consistency, even in the inevitable defeats, is definitely the essence.
Great start, and forward with confidence, imo.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 121 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...