Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Oct 01, 2013 4:51 pm  

roger daly wrote:

Gutterfax why are you a complete tit

I'm guessing genetics plays a part!

Re: Kahn leaves the bulls! : Tue Oct 01, 2013 6:01 pm  

pulsator2k7 wrote:

Apparently issues with September wages, also on the same grapevine heard that the RFL had to help with August wages and that the OOC players did not get paid,

Mr Moore gave assurances regarding the wages so I suspect they were paid.....otherwise we'd have heard from players on social sites.....or maybe it's true that Robbie Paul had to close his twitter account as a condition of him being made CEO

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:02 pm  

I think we'd have heard something on twitter by now if the September wages were late. There's been nothing whatsoever.

I can take all these rumours of RFL assistance and players not liking FC with a pinch of salt. They're not supposed to like him - he's their fecking boss!

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:08 pm  

I get the impression somebody on here has had their big wooden spoon out

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:51 pm  

roger daly wrote:

I get the impression somebody on here has had their big wooden spoon out

You mean the hypocrite gutterfax who presents his own opinion as fact because he's desperate to deflect attention away from his club, which is circling the drain?

The same gutterfax that says a director with 13 failed companies is nothing to worry about, because they're a director of his club, but because one of Bradford's owners has had 9 then that makes him massively unsuitable to be in charge?

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Oct 01, 2013 8:22 pm  

roofaldo2 wrote:

You mean the hypocrite gutterfax who presents his own opinion as fact because he's desperate to deflect attention away from his club, which is circling the drain?

I think he was referring to the poster who said he's heard on the grapevine that there was a wages issue in September and the RFL were "assisting"...but I am flattered.

roofaldo2 wrote:

The same gutterfax that says a director with 13 failed companies is nothing to worry about,

Careful now roofy....... they weren't 13 failed companies. They were 2 sports cafes closed as part of a larger acquisition, Harlequins RL changing it's name back to the broncos and 9 full mergers and acquisitions completed by Ian Lenagans company Workplace Systems International Limited

roofaldo2 wrote:

because they're a director of his club, but because one of Bradford's owners has had 9 then that makes him massively unsuitable to be in charge?

Your guy has closed 9 bars in 7 years and is championed as the leading light in corporate hospitality for the Bradford Bulls V.6. Every single company/Bar/Hotel your new owner has been involved in as a director has dissolved...every single one....

The Director at Harlequins who was also CFO at Workplace Systems International is as far removed from Mr Whitcut as could be possible......and no amount of flapping from you is going to change that.

On the topic of mistaking Opinion for fact....why do you persist with the "13 failed company" stance when it has been shown to you on more than one occasion that this is untrue?

Have the RFL ratified the switch of ownership or are they waiting to see if Bradford will need any FURTHER RFL assistance before the season starts?

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Oct 01, 2013 8:50 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

I think he was referring to the poster who said he's heard on the grapevine that there was a wages issue in September and the RFL were "assisting"...but I am flattered.

Careful now roofy....... they weren't 13 failed companies. They were 2 sports cafes closed as part of a larger acquisition, Harlequins RL changing it's name back to the broncos and 9 full mergers and acquisitions completed by Ian Lenagans company Workplace Systems International Limited

Your guy has closed 9 bars in 7 years and is championed as the leading light in corporate hospitality for the Bradford Bulls V.6. Every single company/Bar/Hotel your new owner has been involved in as a director has dissolved...every single one....

The Director at Harlequins who was also CFO at Workplace Systems International is as far removed from Mr Whitcut as could be possible......and no amount of flapping from you is going to change that.

On the topic of mistaking Opinion for fact....why do you persist with the "13 failed company" stance when it has been shown to you on more than one occasion that this is untrue?

Have the RFL ratified the switch of ownership or are they waiting to see if Bradford will need any FURTHER RFL assistance before the season starts?

I keep saying 13 failed companies because it clearly gets under your skin when people point out your lack of knowledge, idiotic comments and general hypocrisy.

See? This is your hypocrisy. You state that there's perfectly reasonable reasons for the Bronco's director to have 13 failed companies, but there can be no reason other than them being a financial and business disaster for one of the Bulls owner to have 9.

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:17 pm  

roofaldo2 wrote:

I keep saying 13 failed companies because it clearly gets under your skin when people point out your lack of knowledge, idiotic comments and general hypocrisy.

See? This is your hypocrisy. You state that there's perfectly reasonable reasons for the Bronco's director to have 13 failed companies, but there can be no reason other than them being a financial and business disaster for one of the Bulls owner to have 9.

check out the respective registered office addresses of the 2 parties concerned

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:32 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

check out the respective registered office addresses of the 2 parties concerned

And what does that have to do with anything? Oh that's right, nothing. It's just your attempt at being insulting in an attempt to continue to deflect away from questions that you can't properly answer and to try and move away from your hypocrisy without anyone noticing.

It's very sad that you can't actually defend your hypocrisy and have to go the base and low way of trying to ridicule someone for where they live. But if you really want to go that way, where ARE London going to be playing their home games next season? Assuming there's still a club and you've actually got any players to field.

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:48 pm  

roofaldo2 wrote:

And what does that have to do with anything? Oh that's right, nothing. It's just your attempt at being insulting in an attempt to continue to deflect away from questions that you can't properly answer and to try and move away from your hypocrisy without anyone noticing.

It's very sad that you can't actually defend your hypocrisy and have to go the base and low way of trying to ridicule someone for where they live. But if you really want to go that way, where ARE London going to be playing their home games next season? Assuming there's still a club and you've actually got any players to field.

Bless.
Mr Wright is a long time qualified accountant who was CFO of a multi million pound organisation who happened to be made a director of a RL club because his boss asked him to oversee the club after the RFL decided to make him step away, therefore cutting their own throats when it came to expansion.

Mr Whitcut is a publican who has been involved in 9 start-up and then dissolved ventures in 7 years.

The House where Mr Whitcut registered his directorships is worth 160k. He may not live there, but it is a house and not an office or other type of commercial building. This is not a reflection of him or his choice of hometown, but a further indicator as to the level of business acumen we are dealing with here.

There are irrefutable facts.....but you keep on snowing the issue with claims of my incompetence or personal vendettas.

As for London.....are you that desperate you need to repeat what I already agreed with?