Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:04 pm  

paulwalker71 wrote:

I can't really see why it can't be done non-anonymously

Look guys, we'd like to reveal what has been going on because it is not good. But we are bound by instructions from nestegg Counsel and the authorities who have instructed us not to give out any detail as to what the 'matter' may pertain to.

As for CB our legals have made it clear that he is not a BB17 shareholder and thus is in effect presently a virtual legal non-entity in respect of the Bulls. That said, even if he and Sawyer etc gain an interest then it's for the authorities to formally approach the club director(s); not us.

We accept that this is somewhat of a nebulous response, but we have to take heed of advice. What we can offer, however, is that when the investigations are concluded and the story is ready to be published we will forewarn the forum. Deal?

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:12 pm  

nestegg wrote:

Look guys, we'd like to reveal what has been going on because it is not good. But we are bound by instructions from nestegg Counsel and the authorities who have instructed us not to give out any detail as to what the 'matter' may pertain to.

As for CB our legals have made it clear that he is not a BB17 shareholder and thus is in effect presently a virtual legal non-entity in respect of the Bulls. That said, even if he and Sawyer etc gain an interest then it's for the authorities to formally approach the club director(s); not us.

We accept that this is somewhat of a nebulous response, but we have to take heed of advice. What we can offer, however, is that when the investigations are concluded and the story is ready to be published we will forewarn the forum. Deal?

You don’t have to take heed of advice, you choose to.

Take this advice - stop bothering people on here. You’ve already turned one previously regular poster away from the forum and you’ll be sending more the same way if you carry on posting nonsense behind a supposed ‘consortium’.

Do you think anyone really believes that if you were as clued up as you say you are, that you would be posting all of this on here?

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:23 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

You don’t have to take heed of advice, you choose to.

Take this advice - stop bothering people on here. You’ve already turned one previously regular poster away from the forum and you’ll be sending more the same way if you carry on posting nonsense behind a supposed ‘consortium’.

Do you think anyone really believes that if you were as clued up as you say you are, that you would be posting all of this on here?

We note your (repetitive) so called advice and endless shallow attempts to 'put us down'.

We have explained numerous times why we are on the forum, but if you choose not to accept our reasoning then that's your lookout; not ours.

If, as you allege, you believe what we are commenting upon, or alluding to, is nonsense then we (as Pumpetypump did last week) refer you to the 'ignore' button.

Bulls' fans have a common enemy. It's not the nesteggers.

Footnote - we contacted you by PM Ewen in order to simply seek to engage with you in a manner which did not involve endless vitriol. If that wound you up then once again that's your problem. We do not resort to rude behaviour and we will definitely not get wound up by the many forum naysayers. Anyhow, it is the Bulls that is in the midst of a crisis; not this forum.

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:32 pm  

nestegg wrote:

We note your (repetitive) so called advice and endless attempted 'put us downs'.

We have explained numerous times why we are on the forum, but if you choose not to accept our reasoning then that's your lookout; not ours.

If, as you allege, you believe what we are commenting upon, or alluding to, is nonsense then we (as Pumpetypump did last week) refer you to the 'ignore' button.

Bulls' fans have a common enemy. It's not the nesteggers.

You don’t speak for Bulls’ fans and you certainly don’t speak for me.

You claim to care about Bulls fans yet you have already contributed to one Bulls fan no longer coming on here. You deny that what you are doing is immoral whilst plenty of us on here disagree. Initially I wondered if you believed that you are a better judge of morality than the rest of us on here. Then I realised, your moral standards are simply much lower.

I did block you initially, but I think the forum is better served when more of us call you out. I’m sure it won’t be long until you snake away, like your previous aliases.

As it used to be said on here, ‘I claim my five pounds’. This time I reckon there are plenty of us who would be five pounds richer.

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:34 pm  

Eggy,

If your name was to be revealed, would the Bradford Bulls supporting public recognise it?

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:36 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

You don’t speak for Bulls’ fans and you certainly don’t speak for me.

You claim to care about Bulls fans yet you have already contributed to one Bulls fan no longer coming on here. You deny that what you are doing is immoral whilst plenty of us on here disagree. Initially I wondered if you believed that you are a better judge of morality than the rest of us on here. Then I realised, your moral standards are simply much lower.

I did block you initially, but I think the forum is better served when more of us call you out. I’m sure it won’t be long until you snake away, like your previous aliases.

As it used to be said on here, ‘I claim my five pounds’. This time I reckon there are plenty of us who would be five pounds richer.

We repeat what is said in the post above and our supplemental footnote.

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:41 pm  

Bulls4Champs wrote:

Eggy,

If your name was to be revealed, would the Bradford Bulls supporting public recognise it?

Of the six names presently in our fold, some fans would likely recognise two thirds of the nesteggers; some may not.

Recognise that's as clear as mud mate, but it's the best we can do ... for now. Sorry

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 7:07 pm  

nestegg wrote:

Of the six names in our fold, some fans would likely recognise two thirds of the nesteggers; some may not.

Recognise that's as clear as mud mate, but it's the best we can do ... for now. Sorry

Well said Gledhill

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 7:41 pm  

nestegg wrote:

Of the six names presently in our fold, some fans would likely recognise two thirds of the nesteggers; some may not.

Recognise that's as clear as mud mate, but it's the best we can do ... for now. Sorry

I,ll ask you outright are Russ Mcfarlane or Stuart Duffy involved in your so called consortium?

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 7:55 pm  

Johnbulls wrote:

I,ll ask you outright are Russ Mcfarlane or Stuart Duffy involved in your so called consortium?

NO !!!!!!!!!

The current mix (now just increased to 7 persons) is as follows - fans / politician / press and media / creditors / Bulls insider / SE associate / Counsel, and last, but most definitely not least .... a meaningful backer and prospective investor.

Clearly most of the above are Bulls' fans and creditors as you'd expect; otherwise why would they bother.

All nesteggers are public spirited persons who want the Bulls to become more of a community based venture and for the fans voices to be heard and sustainably accounted for. We abhor asset stripping and shameless attempts at profiteering; not that we've seen much (if any) net profit at the Bulls for many a year. That, however, doesn't mean that cash hasn't been allegedly stripped out of the club in recent months and years.

We also want to see a formal investigation into the RFL's central and allegedly purposeful role in the decline of the Bulls in recent years.

We also have an occasional RFL informant along with other generally reliable informants.