[Bulliac]

Re: Gaskell : Sat Feb 22, 2014 4:33 pm  

To be honest they both pose different problems for defenders and that keeps them on their toes. There's no reason why they can't both slip in and out of the role as the game progresses - it's not as though they haven't done it before..

Re: Gaskell : Sat Feb 22, 2014 4:59 pm  

maybe you guys might come in for Seymour on loan given we don't play you while august now I cant see it doing any harm to us or you he needs game time and fitness and I'm sure he wont cost the earth

Re: Gaskell : Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:00 pm  

unless visa is an issue ofc

Re: Gaskell : Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:31 pm  

Don't rate Seymour at all, stand off is not Addy's preferred position but I would still rather play him there than Seymour.

Re: Gaskell : Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:33 pm  

At least we are in the position that we have players who can move around, addy and Kearney. It's not ideal but better than having a huge void to fill with a loan stop gap, would let Henry have a go at 6 it was mentioned he could play SO maybe for abit during the London game if it is going our way.

Re: Gaskell : Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:36 pm  

I just think Addys too static for half back. We originally signed Kearney as a stand off, we seem almost frightened to put him back there some strange reason. Kear has also really impressed at FB. It makes sense.

Playing Addy doesn work for me, plus we leave our back row slightly short.

Re: Gaskell : Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:38 pm  

tigerman1231 wrote:

maybe you guys might come in for Seymour on loan given we don't play you while august now I cant see it doing any harm to us or you he needs game time and fitness and I'm sure he wont cost the earth

Loan him from who? I thought he hadn't actually signed a deal with Cas yet?

Re: Gaskell : Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:38 pm  

Bull Mania wrote:

I just think Addys too static for half back. We originally signed Kearney as a stand off, we seem almost frightened to put him back there some strange reason. Kear has also really impressed at FB. It makes sense.

Playing Addy doesn work for me, plus we leave our back row slightly short.

Because he is poor there?,

Re: Gaskell : Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:39 pm  

Nothus wrote:

Don't rate Seymour at all, stand off is not Addy's preferred position but I would still rather play him there than Seymour.

Agreed, it's not like Gaskell is out for the whole season, and as Addy has filled in at SO and done a job before, I don't currently see the need to bring in another player in that position purely on the back of Gaskell's injury. We've got Kearney who can slot into the halves if we lose either Gale or Addy before Gaskell returns with Kear and Foster able to deputise for him at FB plus I believe Henry played a little in the halves before joining us?

That being said, I'd not be against us signing the right player at the right price to provide a bit more depth and force other players to up their game and keep their place

Re: Gaskell : Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:35 pm  

Henry played at 6 for Newtown last season.