Re: Karl pryce : Mon Aug 15, 2016 4:46 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Bet he dropped those lemons...

Re: Karl pryce : Mon Aug 15, 2016 4:54 pm  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

We got linked with Williams on Sunday in the local rag but its the first anyone had heard of it.

Would be a good signing Williams. Not quite as quick as he used to be but not slow. Makes very good metres going forward and decent under kick (attacking and receiving)

Has a habit of coming in off his wing and been caught out defensively though.

Re: Karl pryce : Mon Aug 15, 2016 5:42 pm  

But Karl Pryce is a big unit.

Re: Karl pryce : Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:09 pm  

But Karl Pryce is a big nit
(Edit for accuracy)

Re: Karl pryce : Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:32 pm  

Blotto wrote:

Mick Worrincy will the next on the list then

I like where you're coming from

Re: Karl pryce : Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:22 pm  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

We got linked with Williams on Sunday in the local rag but its the first anyone had heard of it.

Apologises Greg but who is we??

Re: Karl pryce : Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:34 pm  

Karl Pryce is not happening. End this disgraceful fantasy at once.

Re: Karl pryce : Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:44 pm  

MicktheGled wrote:

Karl Pryce is not happening. End this disgraceful fantasy at once.

There is nothing fantasy about... Nightmare more like!!

Re: Karl pryce : Mon Aug 15, 2016 10:08 pm  

We do need size in the pack and he couldn't be any more timid than they were this year

Re: Karl pryce : Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:30 am  

HAPEtobehere wrote:

We do need size in the pack and he couldn't be any more timid than they were this year

Oh yes he could!