Re: Points deduction upheld : Wed Jun 11, 2014 9:58 pm  

PopTart wrote:

I don't want to add fuel but my only comment is kind of the same as Adeybull says.
Why worry about being banned from somewhere you don't like.

I'd also say there are a lot of sensible posters same as on Bulls forum and some crazies too. Unfortunately the Crazies tend to be the loud ones just like on here.

I will say again though that my post was sincere.
I wish no harm on Bradford and hope they come out of this stronger.
Cas, Widnes and Huddersfield eventually all came back stronger.
Bradford have a better opportunity to come back now providing the club is run within its means and build slowly.

Cheers Poptart, definitely one of the well Reasoned posters on this site!

Re: Points deduction upheld : Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:42 pm  

FickleFingerOfFate wrote:

Looks like 'irate of Sandal's' letter to the RFL worked?
You Classy, Classy fellow.

It was outraged of sandal actually.

The thread that got me banned was an obvious misread of a tweet by carter that played on the mock outrage shown but small minded rl fans. Similar to this effort from you.


You clearly have nonsense of humour. You classy clAssy fellow.

Pop tart can twist things all he likes the fact is he didn't get it either. Why would I care about being banned from the Wakefield board? I don't but if a perso. Had no right to comment on his teams board if he does to like it what gives him the right to comment on my teams board? His attitude is best suited to comments following articles on the mail online

Re: Points deduction upheld : Wed Jun 11, 2014 11:58 pm  

I've never understood posters who take moderation so personally.

Each board has it's own ways of looking at things. A warning is usually a chance to just let someone know they are skirting the rules, yet some people react as though you have just chopped there balls off.

Others go OTT about wanting others banned for being negative sods.

People often go on other forums and start stiring and then try to call it humour when warned to pack it in or get a 7 day ban.

Then moan just as loud when others do the same back.

With something as vital as relegation and promotion on the cards there are always going to be those on both sides that step over the line of being a Troll and those who are over sensitive to said Trolls.

In the end the Bulls have their legal rights to pursue it further if they wish, but it will not be cheap and if it does not pay off will it hurt them more financially next year when the opportunity to bounce back maybe within reach???

Re: Points deduction upheld : Thu Jun 12, 2014 12:34 am  

FA some time ago wrote:

in the unlikely event of David Icke stepping off a lizard spacecraft with our full 6 points wrapped up in pink ribbon - we would still be 13th.

And I rate the chances of Icke and the spacecraft higher than the points back.

And there was no spacecraft either.

Apart from the strange concept mentioned of "force majeure", the details or relevance of which to our case remain unexplained, we never did have any explanation of what grounds if any we supposedly have. From what Green has said, we couldn't explain this preliminary point to the independent panel either.

So, we made an appeal, we've had the appeal, we lost the appeal, and yet we still know absolutely nothing about the appeal. But we are told that the Bulls are jolly well fed up about the appeal because our secret killer point, while still not for public consumption, should have won the day. This mushroomitis seems to be the final fate of a Bulls fan.

Oh well. We've been as good as down for a while now, and as I have said I doubt even an extraordinarily unfeasible full 6 points back would ultimately have prevented that, as we are patently not good enough, for whatever reasons, so the appeal was to me largely an irrelevance. The decision just provides a large degree of certainty to those still harbouring misguided optimism.

Re: Points deduction upheld : Thu Jun 12, 2014 12:57 am  

oh welllll get over you inbreds... you deserve to be relegated anyway.... and take nobhead noble with you... he was over rated as a player as well as a coach

Re: Points deduction upheld : Thu Jun 12, 2014 5:44 am  

ex-salfordian wrote:

oh welllll get over you inbreds... you deserve to be relegated anyway.... and take nobhead noble with you... he was over rated as a player as well as a coach

Noble? Noble? Right.... Bit confused are you love?

Never mind.

Re: Points deduction upheld : Thu Jun 12, 2014 6:11 am  

Maccbull_BigBullyBooaza wrote:

It was outraged of sandal actually.

The thread that got me banned was an obvious misread of a tweet by carter that played on the mock outrage shown but small minded rl fans. Similar to this effort from you.


You clearly have nonsense of humour. You classy clAssy fellow.

Pop tart can twist things all he likes the fact is he didn't get it either. Why would I care about being banned from the Wakefield board? I don't but if a perso. Had no right to comment on his teams board if he does to like it what gives him the right to comment on my teams board? His attitude is best suited to comments following articles on the mail online

For a bloke with a 'riotous cheeky' sense of humour your tone has definitely changed.
To say that you are not 'bothered' about being banned from the board, you seem to be banging on about it.

Re: Points deduction upheld : Thu Jun 12, 2014 6:18 am  

FickleFingerOfFate wrote:

For a bloke with a 'riotous cheeky' sense of humour your tone has definitely changed.
To say that you are not 'bothered' about being banned from the board, you seem to be banging on about it.

It's clearly riled you so take it up with pop tart.


I'm not a moderator so it's out of my hands.

Re: Points deduction upheld : Thu Jun 12, 2014 7:14 am  

Adeybull wrote:

Never mind, your inane, negative, self-opinionated, ad hominem and frequently-strange rantings are seemingly what this forum needs more of.

.

What a drama queen you are. You most probably got warned for your regular abuse of posters calling them such kind things as "pond life" or "vermin" which you then tried to justify.

It is against the AUP, as I am sure you are aware. Despite your belief that you are superior to the rest of us I am afraid to say that you are bound by the same rules as everyone else and if you break them then you deserve to get a warning.

If you are even 10% as intelligent as you think you are then you really should have a grasp of that concept.

Or, is it the case that you think you should be allowed to say what you want without any sanction being taken? What makes you so special?

What is even more galling is that earlier on this thread YOU with absolute no mod powers whatsoever come on and decry MBBB advising him to remove a post that you do not agree with yet when the admin admonish you then you go off in the huff. I always said you were a complete hypocrite, but it is also nice to be able to keep highlighting this to everyone.

Still, when you take your bat home after being told off is hilarious.

Re: Points deduction upheld : Thu Jun 12, 2014 7:42 am  

Pumpetypump wrote:

If I didn't hate emoticons you'd be getting a few eye rolls from me for that one.