[Pumpetypump]

Re: Fev Game : Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:48 am  

I'm impressed that relatively simplistic trolling is working to be honest.

There is a willful, blatant and fairly transparent missing the point going on here. Each time a Bulls fans tries again to point out the nature of the grievance, we appear to be delighting them and they can entirely deliberately miss the point again.

Gindong's faux Featherstone way of typing is surely clue enough he's trying to get a rise? Does tha think he's reet serious rarting posts like this old cock? Fair play.

Re: Fev Game : Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:48 am  

Why does it matter? Fev-eligible players can play, and were always going to be able to play, and we just play the team in front of us.

From a Fev POV, never in a million years would I drop any of the team that has hit such a purple patch of form, to throw in second-rate interlopers. That will pis.s off not only the dropped faithfuls, but also their regular teammates, and more to the point, why would they want that disruption? Frankly, I hope they do. I doubt the names of those Leeds rejects mentioned have anyone at Odsal quaking in their boots. None of them would get in our team.

Re: Fev Game : Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:55 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

I doubt the names of those Leedsp rejects mentioned have anyone at Odsal quaking in their boots. None of them would get in our team.

There's nowt to worry about then is there? Easy peasy.....

Re: Fev Game : Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:56 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Why does it matter? Fev-eligible players can play, and were always going to be able to play, and we just play the team in front of us.

From a Fev POV, never in a million years would I drop any of the team that has hit such a purple patch of form, to throw in second-rate interlopers. That will pis.s off not only the dropped faithfuls, but also their regular teammates, and more to the point, why would they want that disruption? Frankly, I hope they do. I doubt the names of those Leeds rejects mentioned have anyone at Odsal quaking in their boots. None of them would get in our team.

From a fev point of view it might have been better to have announced these loans after Sunday. It can only put doubt into some players heads as to where they stand in the squads future.

As for playing the team in front of us I 100% agree and with the squad we have if we show up we can beat anyone in this league. It's been a big if this year however and fev have probably proved they can do the same too

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Fev Game : Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:56 am  

What bothers me the most about the additional £2 is that I'm expected to cough up even though I'm flying to Menorca this Sunday morning. How is that fair?

Re: Fev Game : Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:57 am  

Will the Fev players who will now be dropped to accommodate Leeds squad members, very unfairly, have to pay £2 to now watch the game from the stand

Re: Fev Game : Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:59 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

I doubt the names of those Leeds rejects mentioned have anyone at Odsal quaking in their boots. None of them would get in our team.

Didn't you say something similar about Batley or Fax recently? One of them I am sure.

That went well.

Re: Fev Game : Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:59 am  

Pumpetypump wrote:

I'm impressed that relatively simplistic trolling is working to be honest.

There is a willful, blatant and fairly transparent missing the point going on here. Each time a Bulls fans tries again to point out the nature of the grievance, we appear to be delighting them and they can entirely deliberately miss the point again.

Gindong's faux Featherstone way of typing is surely clue enough he's trying to get a rise? Does tha think he's reet serious rarting posts like this old cock? Fair play.

See.... now this is genuinely funny. Well done me owd cock.
Btw .. it's "reight", "not reet"!
I cant get my smilies to work eight or I'd post one.

Re: Fev Game : Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:00 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

I'm impressed that relatively simplistic trolling is working to be honest.

There is a willful, blatant and fairly transparent missing the point going on here. Each time a Bulls fans tries again to point out the nature of the grievance, we appear to be delighting them and they can entirely deliberately miss the point again.

Gindong's faux Featherstone way of typing is surely clue enough he's trying to get a rise? Does tha think he's reet serious rarting posts like this old cock? Fair play.

It is actually embarrassing how many of our fans are getting so worked up about this.

TBF, the "siege mentality" has been in operation on RAB for years now but this is quite ridiculous.

[Bulliac]

Re: Fev Game : Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:14 pm  

Rotherham Fev Fan wrote:

Whats boring is reading constant chelping from.some bradford fans re a £2 charge to get to the 70m stand.
Your entrance into the ground is the same as me. It entitles you access to everywhere in the ground other than the new 70m stand. No-one has to pay to get in there. I may or may not choose to do just that
The entrance to see the game is £18.
Which is still cheaper than odsal... which despite all the chelping is the irony that gingdong is presumably referring to.
I dont get this "its the principle" sheeite either. Neither do i care.

Well, thanks for answering twice.....

If you don't like Bradford fans writing about the things they are interested in, can I suggest you're possibly on the wrong site? Easy mistake to make I guess, I mean who would have thought a board called 'Bradford Bulls - redamberandblack' would have been largely populated by Bulls' fans.

Thanks for the pricing info too, btw. Normally this might have been useful but I already have a ticket, so know what the price is. Strangely, and I don't want to shock you with this, but I also know about the [higher] prices at Odsal as I pay them every week, all be it by season ticket.

If you feel like passing on any further information which you think may of interest/help please do so....as you seem to like it you can use the same quote if you want.