Faxhali wrote:
As harsh as this sounds. It's hot sod all to do with Rohan or the players, they were all made redundant. It's entirely up to the new owners to talk to or not talk to whoever they want. It's certainly not the RFL's place to divulge information into the public domain without new owners requesting it.
Sorry Amanda Richardson but your little power struggle on FB won't change that fact.
No idea what the power struggle is about and no interest in it.
But I am intrigued by your other comments. The RFL say they wish to see a Bradford club in the Championship . So they have an interest in the pool of players who are still training , who are , as you say, redundant and have not signed for other clubs. They have an interest in their competition running smoothly - surely that smoothness might just be affected by any new club not having enough players to fulfill the Round 1 fixture. A club who do not have enough players to field a team at Batley this Sunday. A squad of unemployed players which will continue to lose players either through recruitment or securing jobs outside the game.
I did not suggest any communication should include the identity of the new owners. I said that ONE person ,the unemployed coach , should be given the timetable so he could convey that to the unemployed players and staff , who , I think you might accept , have
1. not been paid since the first week of December
2. not secured employment elsewhere
Some may have offers but actually want to stay at a new Bradford .
