Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:13 am  

Roofaldo owned yet again.

Seriously we have some of the thickest fans on the planet. Can't accept being wrong ever. Although we usually are.

Well, some of us anyway.

Fair enough, I would still fancy our chances in a game of Eggheads v Wakefield fans but that is about it.

(Note to Gutterfax - don't state an opinion/tell the truth about our club on here. The natives get restless. They can't handle the truth)

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Sun Nov 17, 2013 9:32 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

Roofaldo owned yet again.

Seriously we have some of the thickest fans on the planet. Can't accept being wrong ever. Although we usually are.

Well, some of us anyway.

Fair enough, I would still fancy our chances in a game of Eggheads v Wakefield fans but that is about it.

(Note to Gutterfax - don't state an opinion/tell the truth about our club on here. The natives get restless. They can't handle the truth)

Well you're usually wrong and don't admit it. People in glass houses and all that.

As for Gutterfax. You made constant character attacks. You made up facts to justify your position. You ignored information that disproved your arguments. In fact, the only smokescreen was the one you were desperate to put up to move eyes away from London's plight and have everyone talking about how Bradford should be kicked out of the league and therefore weakening the chances of London being kicked out. Which as I've already said, you didn't need to do as no one was looking at London because no one cares.

As I've said, repeatedly but as Gutterfax can't process anything that doesn't agree with his argument, I was defending the fact that Mr Whitcutt being involved with the club was not going to be detrimental. The club is still here, he had a hand in sorting out new owners to keep the club here. The RFL ratified the new owners and gave Mr Whitcutt the option of asking for an exemption or even appealing against the RFL's decision on him (again, information purposefully ignored by Gutterfax). So until there's an actual problem with the new board I don't see how me saying "Ryan Whitcutt was not and is not detrimental to the future of the Bulls" is wrong.

But I'm sure you can explain it to me. Go ahead, make something up again.

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:14 am  

The sodding adverts on tv and the mysterious circles appearing around tat in the argos catalogue tell us that it is Christmas and we are morally bound to stop sniping at one another.

[Bulliac]

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:49 am  

Pumpetypump wrote:

The sodding adverts on tv and the mysterious circles appearing around tat in the argos catalogue tell us that it is Christmas and we are morally bound to stop sniping at one another.

Some, the ones who enjoy the travails of others for instance, just drop so low they don't deserve it though, do they? Y'know, not wanting to get my fax wrong or descend into the gutter, like...

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:02 pm  

Think we should be supporting Roofaldo

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:08 pm  

roger daly wrote:

Think we should be supporting Roofaldo

Why so? He had been made to look somewhat foolish on here and will not let it go. Roofaldo is another one of the few on here that seem to think they know everything about the club when they generally get found to be utterly clueless.

It seems that there are too many people come on here and cannot take any criticism of the club whatsoever. Why bother? It is a discussion forum, and if you cannot take a bit of stick about your side you would be as well not bothering.

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:40 pm  

Eddie, to paraphrase you am I right in thinking you said "bah humbug"?

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Sun Nov 17, 2013 2:52 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

Eddie, to paraphrase you am I right in thinking you said "bah humbug"?

Aye. That will do.

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Sun Nov 17, 2013 2:53 pm  

mystic eddie wrote:

Why so? He had been made to look somewhat foolish on here and will not let it go. Roofaldo is another one of the few on here that seem to think they know everything about the club when they generally get found to be utterly clueless.

How so? Come on, what are you basing that on, other than Gutterfax's making up his own version of events?

Please, tell me. If I have this character flaw then I'd like to correct it. So come on, tell me what I said that was wrong in my assertion that Mr Whitcutt was not and, so far, has not been nor currently is detrimental to the future of the Bulls?

As far as I can see, neither you nor Gutterfax can tell me what is wrong with what I've said, but only that it's wrong.

So I implore you, oh he who knows all, what is precisely WRONG with my argument?

I don't claim to be all knowing, if I'm wrong I'll admit to it. But you and your new bosom buddy don't seem to be able to actually point to something and say "There, that is what you have said that was wrong"

But I wait with baited breath for you to do so.

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:58 am  

roofaldo2 wrote: How so? Come on, what are you basing that on, other than Gutterfax's making up his own version of events? This is my first comment on Mr Whitcut in this thread.....the cause of your ire, the reason for your anger. gutterfax wrote: Mr Whitcut is an interesting chap, who since first becoming a company director in 2005, has resigned once and seen another 7 companies he was involved in dissolved. Basically, judging by the history on the company check website, he is a failed Publican. http://companycheck.co.uk/director/912712996 Feel free to point out the stuff I made up, the lies I spread or where I am wrong? I added my opinion as to him being a failed publican given the names of his failed/dissolved companies, but I was 100% correct in my assertion that he wasn't fit and proper person as per the RFL rules. Do you like eating humble pie hot or cold?

roofaldo2 wrote: How so? Come on, what are you basing that on, other than Gutterfax's making up his own version of events? This is my first comment on Mr Whitcut in this thread.....the cause of your ire, the reason for your anger. gutterfax wrote: Mr Whitcut is an interesting chap, who since first becoming a company director in 2005, has resigned once and seen another 7 companies he was involved in dissolved. Basically, judging by the history on the company check website, he is a failed Publican. http://companycheck.co.uk/director/912712996 Feel free to point out the stuff I made up, the lies I spread or where I am wrong? I added my opinion as to him being a failed publican given the names of his failed/dissolved companies, but I was 100% correct in my assertion that he wasn't fit and proper person as per the RFL rules. Do you like eating humble pie hot or cold?