Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:47 pm  

roofaldo2 wrote: But you've still not said what is wrong with my contention that Mr Whitcut has not nor is a bad influence on the Bulls either during his time in charge or so far with the new board/owners he helped bring in. You just keep saying I'm wrong, but don't explain why. If I am wrong, then please explain it to me. I'm big enough to admit when I'm wrong. But so far you've not shown how I AM wrong with that contention. Oh, and YOU brought up other posts. Sorry if I've shown you to be someone who makes up facts or just plain lies, but the fault is yours not mine. Why is it you continue to ignore my first post on the matter...what I posted before you decided to accuse me of agendas, anti-Bradford campaigns and shooting Kennedy? Here it is again...with no mention of the "influence" of Whitcut on Bradford Bulls....just a questioning of his fit and proper standing to run a SL club with the proof as to why questions should have been asked...... gutterfax wrote: Mr Whitcut is an interesting chap, who since first becoming a company director in 2005, has resigned once and seen another 7 companies he was involved in dissolved. Basically, judging by the history on the company check website, he is a failed Publican. http://companycheck.co.uk/director/912712996 why are you terrified to admit I was spot on about this guy whilst you were wrong?

roofaldo2 wrote: But you've still not said what is wrong with my contention that Mr Whitcut has not nor is a bad influence on the Bulls either during his time in charge or so far with the new board/owners he helped bring in. You just keep saying I'm wrong, but don't explain why. If I am wrong, then please explain it to me. I'm big enough to admit when I'm wrong. But so far you've not shown how I AM wrong with that contention. Oh, and YOU brought up other posts. Sorry if I've shown you to be someone who makes up facts or just plain lies, but the fault is yours not mine. Why is it you continue to ignore my first post on the matter...what I posted before you decided to accuse me of agendas, anti-Bradford campaigns and shooting Kennedy? Here it is again...with no mention of the "influence" of Whitcut on Bradford Bulls....just a questioning of his fit and proper standing to run a SL club with the proof as to why questions should have been asked...... gutterfax wrote: Mr Whitcut is an interesting chap, who since first becoming a company director in 2005, has resigned once and seen another 7 companies he was involved in dissolved. Basically, judging by the history on the company check website, he is a failed Publican. http://companycheck.co.uk/director/912712996 why are you terrified to admit I was spot on about this guy whilst you were wrong?

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:56 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

Why is it you continue to ignore my first post on the matter...what I posted before you decided to accuse me of agendas, anti-Bradford campaigns and shooting Kennedy?

Here it is again...with no mention of the "influence" of Whitcut on Bradford Bulls....just a questioning of his fit and proper standing to run a SL club with the proof as to why questions should have been asked......

why are you terrified to admit I was spot on about this guy whilst you were wrong?

Still not said why I'm wrong by saying "Mr Whitcut was not or hasn't been detrimental to the Bulls".

Tbh, you're not going to come up with anything because you have nothing other than your rather childish "I'm right, you're wrong nah nah na na na na" attitude.

I like how you try to once again try and deflect from what I've asked you to prove by saying I'm not allowed to bring up old posts, even though you do that. Then make up more facts and try and brush over it when I call you on.

You went out of your way to put forward an anti-Bradford bias in your posts. I called you on your ignoring of facts that didn't fit your bias and you continued to ignore the facts that don't match up with your argument. You then consistently made up facts to back up your argument or belittle anyone who doesn't immediately say "Wow, you're the most knowledgable poster ever, I shall stop thinking for myself and just believe anything you make up"

Oh and you had a real hissy fit when I used your own argument and use of that website against a London director. Didn't like the tables being turned, did you?

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:05 pm  

roofaldo2 wrote:

Still not said why I'm wrong by saying "Mr Whitcut was not or hasn't been detrimental to the Bulls".

that's not the point under debate.......you said I was wrong about his fit and proper standing to run the bulls....I wasn't.

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:02 am  

Seriously, no-one gives a f*ck.

Re: Khan leaves the bulls! : Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:14 am  

I did a few pages back.