: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:12 pm  

13-5 in 8 years.

: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:13 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

13-5 in 8 years.

So what, that's the past - not a healthy place to live is it

: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:14 pm  

vastman wrote:

So what, that's the past - not a healthy place to live is it

How would you know? There's no point in you looking to the past, present or future, because you support Wakefield. What happened at this date :24/06/2001 ???

: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:25 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

How would you know? There's no point in you looking to the past, present or future, because you support Wakefield. What happened at this date :24/06/2001 ???

Grow up or lay down and put your claws away. Again that is the past that has nothing to do with it.

If you were not so blinkered and so childish you would know that in the late sixties Bradford Northern went out of the league. They only had a future because the following season the then GIANT team of the era Wakefield Trinity lent them the players to get them going. Things come around and there are no guarantees the Bulls will see there recent glory for some time to come, get a grip.

: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:27 pm  

vastman wrote:

Grow up or lay down and put your claws away. Again that is the past that has nothing to do with it.

If you were not so blinkered and so childish you would know that in the late sixties Bradford Northern went out of the league. They only had a future because the following season the then GIANT team of the era Wakefield Trinity lent them the players to get them going. Things come around and there are no guarantees the Bulls will see there recent glory for some time to come, get a grip.

I do know that, as it happens, and I doubt we'll see any glory for a while yet, but I don't think Wakey will either. Anyway, on a lighter note we've both got 3 chances to prove each other wrong! If there's a win for each and a draw we call it stalemate, otherwise I can see more arguing and dragging up the past

: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:33 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

I do know that, as it happens, and I doubt we'll see any glory for a while yet, but I don't think Wakey will either. Anyway, on a lighter note we've both got 3 chances to prove each other wrong! If there's a win for each and a draw we call it stalemate, otherwise I can see more arguing and dragging up the past

\Fine, personally I almost never predict my teams results - there lays madness.

Trinity will have there day again the lack of P&R will give all teams that, but I never expect to see the 1960's era again.

Re: The next eight games : Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:46 am  

Mick Gledhill wrote:

What do we all think as the next eight games will make or break our play-off dream.

LEEDS (H) Referee: Ian Smith = WON 10-6
WAKEFIELD (A) Referee: Richard Silverwood = WIN
WARRINGTON (H) Referee: Steve Ganson = WIN
ST HELENS (A) Referee: TBA = LOSS
WAKEFIELD (MM) Referee: TBA = WIN
CELTIC (H) Referee: TBA = WIN
SALFORD (A) Referee: TBA = WIN
WAKEFIELD (H) Referee: TBA = WIN

That is 12 points out of 14.

Looking good.

So far so good for my predictions.

Bradford will end up in the top four

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:51 am  

vastman wrote:

If you were not so blinkered and so childish you would know that in the late sixties Bradford Northern went out of the league.

And if you were not so keen to chomp before checking your facts Vasty, you'd know that it was actually the early sixties - December 1963 in fact...

Re: The next eight games : Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:53 am  

Mick Gledhill wrote:

So far so good for my predictions.

Bradford will end up in the top four

i agree with you for once mick. Think we might lose one of those at wakey but still looking good. Definitely top 6, hopefully top four.

Re: The next eight games : Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:53 am  

Mick Gledhill wrote:

So far so good for my predictions.

Bradford will end up in the top four

I don't think so. Leeds, Saints, Huddersfield and KR are nailed on for the top four in my opinion.