: Tue May 05, 2009 2:07 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

.. To this day, it keeps regularly referring to the 'Vark, and in very derisory and insulting terms, yet to my knowledge they have not had any direct exchange for many months. ...

Well, after the abject humiliation I bestowed upon the slimy waste of space I can charitably understand it being a tad peeved

I don't often bother with the T&A forum but what is it called on there? I might if at a loose end be tempted to go wind it up a bit more (though the Bulls winning will be doing that more than enough, just now)

PS just had a look and there's no posts on the Bulls forum since Oct 2008??

: Tue May 05, 2009 5:04 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: Well, after the abject humiliation I bestowed upon the slimy waste of space I can charitably understand it being a tad peeved I don't often bother with the T&A forum but what is it called on there? I might if at a loose end be tempted to go wind it up a bit more (though the Bulls winning will be doing that more than enough, just now) PS just had a look and there's no posts on the Bulls forum since Oct 2008?? Not the forum - the de-facto forum that is the "have your say" comments after each Craven Story It is most active whenever there is bad news. But if you check out the latest story, you'll see it contrived to turn a positive into a negative as usual. I poked its anthill, and it responded in the usual way. Not quite so much personal attacks this time - I suspect it maybe half-realises that I only poke it occasionally to start it flying off on the personal stuff - and so it shows itself up even more for what it is. But it can't help itself. Check out the story about Noble returning a few days ago for more of its "insane drivel" (not my words!) for more examples of how easy it is to set it off on one. Trouble is, you have to from time to time, else folk seem to start taking it seriously. Don't think you'll have much trouble spotting it on there. You'll see it has almost certainly read your post on here... ps. I very rarely post on there. When I do, its "Adeybull". There is an "Adey" who posts, but that's not me (several have asked).

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: Well, after the abject humiliation I bestowed upon the slimy waste of space I can charitably understand it being a tad peeved I don't often bother with the T&A forum but what is it called on there? I might if at a loose end be tempted to go wind it up a bit more (though the Bulls winning will be doing that more than enough, just now) PS just had a look and there's no posts on the Bulls forum since Oct 2008?? Not the forum - the de-facto forum that is the "have your say" comments after each Craven Story It is most active whenever there is bad news. But if you check out the latest story, you'll see it contrived to turn a positive into a negative as usual. I poked its anthill, and it responded in the usual way. Not quite so much personal attacks this time - I suspect it maybe half-realises that I only poke it occasionally to start it flying off on the personal stuff - and so it shows itself up even more for what it is. But it can't help itself. Check out the story about Noble returning a few days ago for more of its "insane drivel" (not my words!) for more examples of how easy it is to set it off on one. Trouble is, you have to from time to time, else folk seem to start taking it seriously. Don't think you'll have much trouble spotting it on there. You'll see it has almost certainly read your post on here... ps. I very rarely post on there. When I do, its "Adeybull". There is an "Adey" who posts, but that's not me (several have asked).

: Tue May 05, 2009 5:56 pm  

Adeybull wrote: Not the forum - the de-facto forum that is the "have your say" comments after each Craven Story It is most active whenever there is bad news. But if you check out the latest story, you'll see it contrived to turn a positive into a negative as usual. I poked its anthill, and it responded in the usual way. Not quite so much personal attacks this time - I suspect it maybe half-realises that I only poke it occasionally to start it flying off on the personal stuff - and so it shows itself up even more for what it is. But it can't help itself. Check out the story about Noble returning a few days ago for more of its "insane drivel" (not my words!) for more examples of how easy it is to set it off on one. Trouble is, you have to from time to time, else folk seem to start taking it seriously. Don't think you'll have much trouble spotting it on there. You'll see it has almost certainly read your post on here... ps. I very rarely post on there. When I do, its "Adeybull". There is an "Adey" who posts, but that's not me (several have asked). You doth protest to much

Adeybull wrote: Not the forum - the de-facto forum that is the "have your say" comments after each Craven Story It is most active whenever there is bad news. But if you check out the latest story, you'll see it contrived to turn a positive into a negative as usual. I poked its anthill, and it responded in the usual way. Not quite so much personal attacks this time - I suspect it maybe half-realises that I only poke it occasionally to start it flying off on the personal stuff - and so it shows itself up even more for what it is. But it can't help itself. Check out the story about Noble returning a few days ago for more of its "insane drivel" (not my words!) for more examples of how easy it is to set it off on one. Trouble is, you have to from time to time, else folk seem to start taking it seriously. Don't think you'll have much trouble spotting it on there. You'll see it has almost certainly read your post on here... ps. I very rarely post on there. When I do, its "Adeybull". There is an "Adey" who posts, but that's not me (several have asked). You doth protest to much

: Tue May 05, 2009 6:12 pm  

redeverready wrote:

You doth protest to much

Not at all. Whoever it is seems to know what he is talking about regarding rugby. Sadly, its not me!

: Tue May 05, 2009 9:35 pm  

Wigan Bull wrote:

Indeed.

As I understand it, the Wigan board don't want to be seen as sacking yet another coach.

Wigan (allegedly) contacted Bradford re: Noble, with the intention of (if the Bulls accepted) creating the impression Noble had "chosen" to leave.

Again, "as I understand it", Bradford or not, he won't be offered another contract at Wigan.

Good, glad I wasn't imagining things again. It does look pretty clear that Noble wont be at Wigan next year, and thankfully equally clear that he won't be at Bradford either.

I know that Noble has come out and said he was disappointed with Bradford publicly rubbishing any rumours, but if what you say is anywhere near the story then I'm glad we did and Noble can look closer to home for a good whinge.

: Tue May 05, 2009 11:18 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

...

Don't think you'll have much trouble spotting it on there. You'll see it has almost certainly read your post on here...

Ah yes, easy indeed.

Seems the imbecile did take the drubbing administered on here to heart, judging by the pathetic Gollum-like scribblings.

I might get the homophobic moron banned off that forum too, if I can ever be arrsed. Though at the moment the Bulls excellent results are clearly paining it so much, maybe it should be allowed to stew in its own excruciating embarrassment