Re: Squad numbers : Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:35 am  

If Adele had been a Bull, her debut album would probably have accidentally been called '16'

Re: Squad numbers : Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:36 am  

16 is the number printed on the front of the Johnny Hero (one of the earliest action figures) jogging suit

Re: Squad numbers : Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:37 am  

There is a road called the A16

Re: Squad numbers : Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:18 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: "What more do we want"? Er, the squad to be on the squad page! It ain't rocket science. And you wouldn't need any pictures from any photoshoot. Until you get them, just yer actual squad would do fine. They could even have copy and pasted it. Your suggestion is so lame it's embarrassing. On the "news" page there's a menu of about 20 items and "Cummins confirms squad numbers" is somewhere amongst that lot, are you seriously suggesting that this is enough to compensate for the fact that there is no mention of this on the actual Squad page? Anyway, as you seem to be in the know, can you clear another thing up for me. In Franny's stated confirmation, it says that Danny Addy is number 16. yet at the presentation evening he got presented number 17. What more do I want? Well, maybe we could start with the answer to that? I also thought that the new shirts looked awful. As I predicted when they were released, from any distance you just don't get any sense of red and amber being important at all, they all blur into a sort of dark purple stripe look; and from the back, they are basically just plain white. Worst looking kit for ages. Ok for casual wear but as a team strip I hate it. http://www.bradfordbulls.co.uk/squad/first_team Happy now? Moutains out of molehills springs to mind.

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: "What more do we want"? Er, the squad to be on the squad page! It ain't rocket science. And you wouldn't need any pictures from any photoshoot. Until you get them, just yer actual squad would do fine. They could even have copy and pasted it. Your suggestion is so lame it's embarrassing. On the "news" page there's a menu of about 20 items and "Cummins confirms squad numbers" is somewhere amongst that lot, are you seriously suggesting that this is enough to compensate for the fact that there is no mention of this on the actual Squad page? Anyway, as you seem to be in the know, can you clear another thing up for me. In Franny's stated confirmation, it says that Danny Addy is number 16. yet at the presentation evening he got presented number 17. What more do I want? Well, maybe we could start with the answer to that? I also thought that the new shirts looked awful. As I predicted when they were released, from any distance you just don't get any sense of red and amber being important at all, they all blur into a sort of dark purple stripe look; and from the back, they are basically just plain white. Worst looking kit for ages. Ok for casual wear but as a team strip I hate it. http://www.bradfordbulls.co.uk/squad/first_team Happy now? Moutains out of molehills springs to mind.

Re: Squad numbers : Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:26 pm  

They've even shown Diskin's sponsor as Red Amber &Black!!

Re: Squad numbers : Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:25 pm  

Bullnorthern wrote:

They've even shown Diskin's sponsor as Red Amber &Black!!

That's quick work - anyone know who has the "007" shirt - we could do with an enforcer

Re: Squad numbers : Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:42 pm  

SombreroBu11 wrote:

http://www.bradfordbulls.co.uk/squad/first_team

Happy now? Moutains out of molehills springs to mind.

Looks like their going with mass hallucination excuse for numbers announced at presentation evening then .

Re: Squad numbers : Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:47 pm  

Giants again at Magic weekend,going on last seasons league table that's 1 v 9,that's good

Re: Squad numbers : Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:22 pm  

SombreroBu11 wrote:

http://www.bradfordbulls.co.uk/squad/first_team

Happy now?

What? That the Bulls squad appears on the Bulls Squad page?

SombreroBu11 wrote:

Moutains out of molehills springs to mind.

It was and remains an embarrassment - the numbers still do not all correspond to the shirts that the players were presented with) - it is hardly a "molehill". But nobody has built it up into a "mountain" either, a number of people have pointed out and commented on the confusion, and rightly so. What's your problem?

Re: Squad numbers : Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:26 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

What? That the Bulls squad appears on the Bulls Squad page?

Well, yeah. Seen as that's what you were complaining about. So much so that it was apparently a disgrace to have to look through the news entries just because they weren't on the squad page yet.

It was and remains an embarrassment - the numbers still do not all correspond to the shirts that the players were presented with) - it is hardly a "molehill". But nobody has built it up into a "mountain" either, a number of people have pointed out and commented on the confusion, and rightly so. What's your problem?

An "embarrassment"? An "insult to players and staff"? Bit over dramatic don't you think? So somebody has made a typo on either the list given for the squad numbers for the e-mail or haven't had chance to finish the page on the website yet. Is it really that big of a deal. I mean, what difference does it actually make? You'er right, it's hardly a molehill. A molehill would look like a mountain compared to this.