Re: Sammut : Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:52 pm  

vastman wrote:

Are you for real?

Apparently.

My logic is undeniable. Sammut started at a club above you, and is now further down then even us. I think it is hard to argue that his career is on an upwards trajectory. Even FA would struggle to make a case for that one.

Re: Sammut : Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:53 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Oh no, debaser was the winner of the RAB 2013 Turing test competition. (I was the runner-up). It promised to be a close run thing but then Noble & Honest had a major short circuit in the logic board, and, well, you'll have no doubt seen the tragic results.

I remember the Turing test. I think I passed third time. And I had to wear a short skirt.

Re: Sammut : Tue Jun 24, 2014 7:14 am  

debaser wrote:

I remember the Turing test. I think I passed third time. And I had to wear a short skirt.

Whether you passed the test or not you are always something of an enigma.

Re: Sammut : Tue Jun 24, 2014 7:20 am  

rugbyreddog wrote:

It must make a change for him to leave a club not in administration

The way Fev are going it won't be too long.

Re: Sammut : Tue Jun 24, 2014 7:32 am  

debaser wrote:

I remember the Turing test. I think I passed third time. And I had to wear a short skirt.

What were you turning? Apart from stomachs

Re: Sammut : Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:16 am  

[quote="debaser"]Apparently.

My logic is undeniable. Sammut started at a club above you, and is now further down then even us. I think it is hard to argue that his career is on an upwards trajectory.[/quote

Even if he stayed at Fev he would be at a club with ambition, their own ground with plans approved for ground improvements financial stability players' that want to be there and a secure future, where as you have what exactly?.

Re: Sammut : Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:26 am  

We have an iconic ground, and Jimmy Lowes.

But had Sammut not run off, then he may well have been better off. As it is, he is not. However you spin it.

Re: Sammut : Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:54 am  

debaser wrote:

We have an iconic ground, and Jimmy Lowes.

But had Sammut not run off, then he may well have been better off. As it is, he is not. However you spin it.

Is that it! an iconic ground in which you are tenants, and James Lowes, and according to you, he might just might maybe, have been better off staying What a powerful and compelling argument you put forward.

Re: Sammut : Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:57 am  

chissitt wrote:

Is that it! an iconic ground in which you are tenants, and James Lowes, and according to you, he might just might maybe, have been better off staying What a powerful and compelling argument you put forward.

Its not an argument. It is a statement of fact.
He left a winning Super League team, where he was first choice on the team sheet, to a losing SL team, who did not win a game he played in, who then dropped him and shipped him out to a Championship side. Anyone can see that his career went down hill when he left us.

Re: Sammut : Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:08 am  

http://www.skysports.com/rugbyleague/ma ... _1,00.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/27207671 You might just want to rethink what you think.

http://www.skysports.com/rugbyleague/ma ... _1,00.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/27207671 You might just want to rethink what you think.