Re: Lee Gaskell : Sun Aug 14, 2016 6:11 pm  

PHILISAN wrote:

hmm...No strings there then!

None that are fully attached, no.

Re: Lee Gaskell : Sun Aug 14, 2016 6:34 pm  

Seems a bit out of order to me.

Re: Lee Gaskell : Sun Aug 14, 2016 7:32 pm  

Highlander wrote:

When Leigh replace Huddersfield in SL, will his contract still hold?

Would love this to Happen.

I don't think think we need to play Gaskell. Leave him out.

Re: Lee Gaskell : Sun Aug 14, 2016 7:50 pm  

Highlander wrote:

When Leigh replace Huddersfield in SL, will his contract still hold?

Don't know but it will be as funny as f@(k though.

Re: Lee Gaskell : Sun Aug 14, 2016 8:12 pm  

RickyF1 wrote:

Would love this to Happen.

I don't think think we need to play Gaskell. Leave him out.

Agreed. I'd leave out any player now who's said they don't want to be here next year provided we can cover the spot in the 17 with someone who does want to stay.

Re: Lee Gaskell : Sun Aug 14, 2016 8:28 pm  

What was said on that BCB panel last week with Karl Harrison about some of the players? It was either they were refusing to tell Rohan if they were staying or weren't saying which club they were going to? Karl was annoyed about the lack of common courtesy iirc

Re: Lee Gaskell : Mon Aug 15, 2016 12:30 am  

DrFeelgood wrote:

Did I hear correctly that Gaskell declared himself unavailable to play today?

I would take it with a pinch of salt. However if it was true (and I would be surprised if it was), I wouldn't pick that player again and I would be happy for them to leave. Wrong attitude entirely and I wouldn't want someone like that at the club, regardless of ability.