Re: Chisholm - Knee reconstruction : Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:09 pm  

HamsterChops wrote:

Don't be so daft. That's about as likely as Bradford losing to Dewsbury.

Re: Chisholm - Knee reconstruction : Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:57 am  

Bull Mania wrote:

Chisholm was outstanding for us. The TEAM got outplayed by fev. The forwards didnt get out of iur half that day. Chisholm wasn't the reason we lost. Not sure what point you are trying to make.

OK, let's make it simple for you - a HB can't play without the forwards laying a foundation. Get it now?

If you've still not twigged,t I'll spell it out...... you do not need a HB you need some hairy assed forwards.

Re: Chisholm - Knee reconstruction : Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:07 am  

thepimp007 wrote:

Ha ha keep trying sweetheart

I think you may have lost it. You desperately need some grunt up front. Putting Wally Lewis and Alan Langer in your team wouldn't help much whilst they're being totally dominated in the forwards.....

Re: Chisholm - Knee reconstruction : Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:26 am  

For Dane personally, injury is a terrible thing where you cant get on the field and help, but Im sure theres a good chance his contract will be for full pay if injured and his value despite that injury probably went up because of the game against Hull Kr and the lasting memory that will have on people meaning he can probably demand an even bigger contract next season.

Re: Chisholm - Knee reconstruction : Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:15 pm  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

For Dane personally, injury is a terrible thing where you cant get on the field and help, but Im sure theres a good chance his contract will be for full pay if injured and his value despite that injury probably went up because of the game against Hull Kr and the lasting memory that will have on people meaning he can probably demand an even bigger contract next season.

Any player who is out of the game for 8 months with a knee reconstruction is a huge risk for any club to take on.

Re: Chisholm - Knee reconstruction : Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:55 am  

debaser wrote:

He has that X factor. And it certainly made a difference in the 50 mins he played for us.

It's unusual that a player we've signed for the X factor actually had X factor

Re: Chisholm - Knee reconstruction : Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:51 pm  

Mr Dog wrote:

I think you may have lost it. You desperately need some grunt up front. Putting Wally Lewis and Alan Langer in your team wouldn't help much whilst they're being totally dominated in the forwards.....

I wasnt commenting on the fact we need grunt its your slating of Chisholms performance in a game where the whole team bottled it, starting with the forwards giving him no platform to work from whatsoever

Re: Chisholm - Knee reconstruction : Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:57 pm  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

For Dane personally, injury is a terrible thing where you cant get on the field and help, but Im sure theres a good chance his contract will be for full pay if injured and his value despite that injury probably went up because of the game against Hull Kr and the lasting memory that will have on people meaning he can probably demand an even bigger contract next season.

According to Chalmers he is one of the top 2 earners at the club. Can't see that being increased when we drop into Ch1.

Re: Chisholm - Knee reconstruction : Wed Jun 21, 2017 7:29 am  

rugbyreddog wrote:

According to Chalmers he is one of the top 2 earners at the club. Can't see that being increased when we drop into Ch1.

Wont stop him asking and with the fans backing after his "miracle" performance against KR it will put a bit of pressure on the board to not let him slip through your fingers again.

Re: Chisholm - Knee reconstruction : Wed Jun 21, 2017 11:21 am  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

Wont stop him asking and with the fans backing after his "miracle" performance against KR it will put a bit of pressure on the board to not let him slip through your fingers again.

By next year it may be 'backing of the fan'(singular)