Re: George Flanagan : Sat Feb 24, 2018 9:09 am  

Stul wrote:

Which makes his actual 29 years more like 27 in terms of miles on the clock.

He is not 29 he is 31 mate. Another thing not checked properly when the Bulls are releasing statements. Kear even said in what was printed in telegraph he was 31. Lack of research on a cracking signing and very poor by the clubs releases again. It's got past being a joke now its extremely annoying

Re: George Flanagan : Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:19 am  

I am not bothered whether the statement said 29 or 31. I stopped worrying about that - in fact, I never did worry about things like that. He is a good signing and it shows that the hybrid system is working for us this year and even next as we are picking up some very good part time players. What a difference to a couple of years ago when we seemed to sign players from YouTube clips. Kear is signing people he knows and that assures me greatly.

Re: George Flanagan : Sun Feb 25, 2018 3:49 pm  

Given an extra week to prepare, not in the squad today

[Bulliac]

Re: George Flanagan : Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:48 am  

Anyone heard what squad number he's getting?
I'm guessing no.16 but there's nothing on the website as yet.

Re: George Flanagan : Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:08 am  

Bulliac wrote:

Anyone heard what squad number he's getting?
I'm guessing no.16 but there's nothing on the website as yet.

16 been allocated to Dan King by all accounts.

21, 22 or 23 would be the logical assigments, but I suspect you'll have to wait until you see him in the shirt to know for sure. The idiot in charge of the website would probably only get it wrong if he tried to put it on there anyway.

Re: George Flanagan : Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:14 am  

HamsterChops wrote:

16 been allocated to Dan King by all accounts.

21, 22 or 23 would be the logical assigments, but I suspect you'll have to wait until you see him in the shirt to know for sure. The idiot in charge of the website would probably only get it wrong if he tried to put it on there anyway.

He’s 21

[Bulliac]

Re: George Flanagan : Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:56 pm  

HamsterChops wrote:

16 been allocated to Dan King by all accounts.

21, 22 or 23 would be the logical assigments, but I suspect you'll have to wait until you see him in the shirt to know for sure. The idiot in charge of the website would probably only get it wrong if he tried to put it on there anyway.

The website is a bit behind at the moment (Dan King isn't even mentioned as being in the squad), though I expect they've been putting more time into sorting out the big website change than the finer points. They do usually mention in the blurb following a signing which number he'll take up in the squad, but it seems to have been missed this time.