Re: Bradford Bulls vs North Wales Crusaders : Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:32 pm
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:
Looking at the version on the RFL site, I agree that the Operational Rules are very clear, he is not eligible, the Reserve game simply does not count. I am struggling to see why they even wrote to ask.
They say they have a letter from RFL saying he is clear to play but I don't know what they said in their request. Either way, the RFL (apart from cases where it may be authorised to give special dispensations) cannot change the Rules. It is always the club's responsibility to comply with the Rules, and I don't think any letter would count as "legal advice", it's just somebody's opinion, of whatever they've been asked. If we are found to have broken the Rules then we will be punished. The letter may be in mitigation, but if the player is ineligible, then it will not be an excuse.
They say they have a letter from RFL saying he is clear to play but I don't know what they said in their request. Either way, the RFL (apart from cases where it may be authorised to give special dispensations) cannot change the Rules. It is always the club's responsibility to comply with the Rules, and I don't think any letter would count as "legal advice", it's just somebody's opinion, of whatever they've been asked. If we are found to have broken the Rules then we will be punished. The letter may be in mitigation, but if the player is ineligible, then it will not be an excuse.
Indeed, that's always the worry, FA.
I'm far from sure why we're even bothered for this game, for sure we're "treating all games as important" as of course we should, but I wouldn't have even broatched the subject with the RFL - did we really need to? Seriously? Surely not. After all, threequarters don't decide whether we win games, just by how many..