Re: carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:46 am  

MrPhilb wrote:

Which Wakefield players have we taken in the week building into the season?

I guess you could be talking about the ones signed in October for a few quid though?

regardless of when you signed them or paid for them, they were still under contract, same thing!

Re: carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:52 am  

roger daly wrote:

But surely if players are released they still need to be paid off unless they have signed for somebody else and everyone's happy.In McDonnells case isn't he coming back from a long injury,which I would of thought he hasn't signed for somebody else

As far as I know, if you release a player before he has played a game in the season, it doesn't count on the cap.

Re: carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:53 am  

No offence meant here but we are concerned about the goings on at our club on here, not when or if Hull KR poached any players from Wakie last year

Re: carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:54 am  

number 6 wrote:

regardless of when you signed them or paid for them, they were still under contract, same thing!

It is isn't it, we'll do the honourable thing and get the business done early doors even chucking a few quid their way while you'll look to exploit any loophole you can in order to take their players for free with practically no chance of replacing them less than a week before they kick off the season.


Just compounding their troubles, shameful behaviour really.

If you want them then I'm sure they'll happily take fees for both given how far down the track you've taken it with their players.

Re: carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:14 am  

MrPhilb wrote:

It is isn't it, we'll do the honourable thing and get the business done early doors even chucking a few quid their way while you'll look to exploit any loophole you can in order to take their players for free with practically no chance of replacing them less than a week before they kick off the season.


Just compounding their troubles, shameful behaviour really.

If you want them then I'm sure they'll happily take fees for both given how far down the track you've taken it with their players.

You seem more upset than the Bradford fans.

Re: carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:20 am  

MrPhilb wrote:

It is isn't it, we'll do the honourable thing and get the business done early doors even chucking a few quid their way while you'll look to exploit any loophole you can in order to take their players for free with practically no chance of replacing them less than a week before they kick off the season.


Just compounding their troubles, shameful behaviour really.

If you want them then I'm sure they'll happily take fees for both given how far down the track you've taken it with their players.

I like you.

Re: carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:41 am  

MrPhilb wrote:

It is isn't it, we'll do the honourable thing and get the business done early doors even chucking a few quid their way while you'll look to exploit any loophole you can in order to take their players for free with practically no chance of replacing them less than a week before they kick off the season.


Just compounding their troubles, shameful behaviour really.

If you want them then I'm sure they'll happily take fees for both given how far down the track you've taken it with their players.

You didn't pay a fee for Poore.

If we are required to pay a fee we will, but if the RFL says we don't (For whatever reasons) then why would pay a fee, we are a business after all. Whilst not helping them on th pitch we are helping them off then pitch by taking two of their higher ending players on their wage bill, like you did with Poore.

The timing isn't great for either club TBH.

Re: carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:46 am  

Unbelievable, so Hull are helping us out by getting Carvell and Gales wage off the payroll.

Re: carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:48 am  

Staffs FC wrote:

You seem more upset than the Bradford fans.

He is.

Re: carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:48 am  

MrPhilb wrote:

It is isn't it, we'll do the honourable thing and get the business done early doors even chucking a few quid their way while you'll look to exploit any loophole you can in order to take their players for free with practically no chance of replacing them less than a week before they kick off the season.


Just compounding their troubles, shameful behaviour really.

If you want them then I'm sure they'll happily take fees for both given how far down the track you've taken it with their players.

poore and cockayne were contracted to wakefield, their assets, you removed them from wakefield, no difference to what we are doing and you only paid for one of them


have sympathy for the bulls fans, but not for the club, they did it to us with vaikona and radford, albeit different owners, what comes around goes around as they say