Re: Marc Green statement / Appeal : Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:11 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

If they withhold the information then Green carries on to the High Court. And you think that scenario is saving blushes? Wow.

The avenger presents the case for the defence, whilst also giving his version of the case for the prosecution.
perhaps his name should be, confused dot com.

It does leave a vaccuum somewhere, whereby anyone who is outside the lofty Halls (red) must live in, because they spend money and time employing a legal team, who prepare a draft on a ciggie packet to put to those venerable gentlemen, who then have a jolly good laugh, and send them packing?
As you say PP wow!!!

Re: Marc Green statement / Appeal : Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:51 am  

Slugger McBatt wrote:

The worrying thing maybe is that his desperation to succeed might mask his real intentions come relegation; i.e., bale out.

So you think his real intentions are to do a runner after a. Losing out on the money he loaned the club and b. funding the losses for half a super league season?

This could be that you're so worried about the bulls you're now talking foolish gibberish or your real intentions have become clear after a cock up; i.e. poor attempt at trolling

Re: Marc Green statement / Appeal : Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:27 am  

So in lay mans terms can some one enlighten this thick head to exactly what you guys think MG is trying to expose? I just don't get it, is he genuinely going for the six points back? Or are people suggesting he's pushing in order to expose the RFL, and as a consequence get a change of leadership? Cos I'm buggered if I get it!

Re: Marc Green statement / Appeal : Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:41 am  

JINJER wrote:

So in lay mans terms can some one enlighten this thick head to exactly what you guys think MG is trying to expose? I just don't get it, is he genuinely going for the six points back? Or are people suggesting he's pushing in order to expose the RFL, and as a consequence get a change of leadership? Cos I'm buggered if I get it!

The fact that the RFL lied to the Bulls I guess.

Re: Marc Green statement / Appeal : Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:43 am  

JINJER wrote:

So in lay mans terms can some one enlighten this thick head to exactly what you guys think MG is trying to expose? I just don't get it, is he genuinely going for the six points back? Or are people suggesting he's pushing in order to expose the RFL, and as a consequence get a change of leadership? Cos I'm buggered if I get it!

It depends on what your definition of "is" is.

Re: Marc Green statement / Appeal : Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:12 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

It depends on what your definition of "is" is.

Pardon?

Re: Marc Green statement / Appeal : Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:24 pm  

JINJER wrote:

So in lay mans terms can some one enlighten this thick head to exactly what you guys think MG is trying to expose? I just don't get it, is he genuinely going for the six points back? Or are people suggesting he's pushing in order to expose the RFL, and as a consequence get a change of leadership? Cos I'm buggered if I get it!

Having been at the "Pit head" like lots of supporters who have taken more of an interest in how things have unfolded over these last two + years. I can say that there are many unanswered questions in how the RFL have reached their many conclusions that has mostly created more damage to the "Bulls".
This one is probably the last straw that broke the camels back, and hopefully we may begin to get to the truth of the matter.

Rest assured MG wouldn't go this far if he had felt that this judgement he faced via this so called Independent Sporting sanctions panel, was totally without any prejudice for whatever reason.

Remember that they (RFL) will not release any report due to sensitive information?

As far as all Bulls supporters are likely to think, we cannot get any more insensitive than being relegated at the end of the season.

Re: Marc Green statement / Appeal : Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:40 pm  

Just a thought, but has anyone considered the possibility that the club may have asked for the judgement not to be made public ? After all, they will have received a copy and could easily put it into the public domain if they wished to do so.

Re: Marc Green statement / Appeal : Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:02 pm  

JINJER wrote:

So in lay mans terms can some one enlighten this thick head to exactly what you guys think MG is trying to expose? I just don't get it, is he genuinely going for the six points back? Or are people suggesting he's pushing in order to expose the RFL, and as a consequence get a change of leadership? Cos I'm buggered if I get it!

I don't think its about the 6 points anymore.

Consider this;

Nigel Wood has nowhere near the qualities and acumen of his predecesor Richard Lewis.

He simply waited for the better man to leave and took the job - no process involved.

When someone like this gains power, in order to retain it and look good, you must employ people who are even worse at the job than he is.

I think this is what has happened and those now in control are not upto the job.

This ensures when he returns from his stint at the International Level of administration - he will "look good".

The RFL has quickly gone from an organisation that despite some shortcomings - had the overall good of the game at heart - to one I have absolutely no faith in whatsoever.

It may be I am wrong and the RFL are actually doing a wonderful job?

All current owners/chairmen of SL clubs may also think they do a wonderful job too?

Halifax fans may bear testament to what Nigel Wood is capable of - I have read some interesting posts in the past.

Its vital his empire is dismantled quickly and a quality, professional and respected team manage Rugby League.

I have banged on about this for ages - but still people think its about the points - which is pointless

Re: Marc Green statement / Appeal : Wed Jul 02, 2014 2:03 pm  

People keep saying that Green will want his money back. I may be wrong here but wasn't the loan from the company he owns. Won't these companies have insurance against people not paying it back. Might his company already have claimed it back - so he may not need to chase it from the Bulls. If so, he didn't lose anything and possibly won the bid for the Bulls because of it - effectively getting the Bulls for next to nothing? So taking over the Bulls may not be about getting money out of them.