Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Thu May 04, 2017 1:24 pm  

RickyF1 wrote:

The Game Caller‏ @TheGameCaller 1h1 hour ago
Some new faces at Tong.

Signings or dual reg???

I saw this, doesn't seem massively enthused so probably a few Widnes lads but every little helps!!

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Thu May 04, 2017 1:54 pm  

RAB-2411 wrote:

I saw this, doesn't seem massively enthused so probably a few Widnes lads but every little helps!!

You are correct


@TheGameCaller


The Game Caller Retweeted aarron manning
Regarding my last tweet it's regarding the club's dual registration partnership with Widnes. No sightings of Phoenix or Chisholm.

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Thu May 04, 2017 2:03 pm  

RickyF1 wrote:

You are correct


@TheGameCaller


The Game Caller Retweeted aarron manning
Regarding my last tweet it's regarding the club's dual registration partnership with Widnes. No sightings of Phoenix or Chisholm.

So no sign of the season long loans hes been prattling on about either.

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Thu May 04, 2017 2:05 pm  

mat wrote:

So no sign of the season long loans hes been prattling on about either.

Doesn't sound like it. I don't believe anything I read anymore. Not having a go at Mick, I mean from loads of others too.

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Thu May 04, 2017 3:49 pm  

Well maybe someone at the club is listening to better communication as the first time in a while we have an injury update. Unfortunately its not good news.

Bentley out for 3-4 weeks. Peltier is however looking to be back for the London game which is a big boost

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Thu May 04, 2017 5:25 pm  

Bull Mania wrote:

Well maybe someone at the club is listening to better communication as the first time in a while we have an injury update. Unfortunately its not good news.

Bentley out for 3-4 weeks. Peltier is however looking to be back for the London game which is a big boost

Shame that Lee Smith and Joe Keyes just aren't mentioned and the useless bugger that wrote it still doesn't proof read. But it's a step in the right direction, albeit one that is more of a stumble than a step.

[Bulliac]

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Thu May 04, 2017 6:05 pm  

bullinenemyland wrote:

I said it before and I'll say it again... This is a new club. The previous history is gone, so has the honours. It all started from scratch for me and therefore I would rather go by this than expectations of the past.

Anyone who has started a new business will know that it just doesn't go smoothly to start with. Not in the first 12-24months. It will take 3-4yrs for it to bed down so when I hear folk talking about SL in 2yrs I take it with a pinch of salt.

Except it's not totally new, in as much as a fair number of the people doing the 'hands on', actual rugby and office side, are the same, more or less, as before. What has changed is the owner of the business. As far as the rugby is concerned, whilst it isn't completely either of the two, it's as much a 'take over' as it is a 'brand new business', imo.

Up to last season, the club was regarded as having been founded in 1863. Regardless of the legalities, if that didn't change in 1907 and 1963 and with the more recent screw ups, I'm far from sure it changed last year either.

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Thu May 04, 2017 6:07 pm  

HamsterChops wrote:

Shame that Lee Smith and Joe Keyes just aren't mentioned and the useless bugger that wrote it still doesn't proof read. But it's a step in the right direction, albeit one that is more of a stumble than a step.

Keyes and Ryan ok for Sunday, but source is billy bullsh@t so take with a pinch of salt.

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Thu May 04, 2017 6:09 pm  

mat wrote:

Keyes and Ryan ok for Sunday, but source is billy bullsh@t so take with a pinch of salt.

Mat who's Billy Bulls baba?

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Thu May 04, 2017 6:38 pm  

roger daly wrote:

Mat who's Billy Bulls baba?

gledhill