[Bullseye]

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 10:55 am  

Cheers for that bit of pedantry. Edited accordingly.

Point still holds, there have been far more “outs” than “ins”.

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 11:12 am  

I don't believe Wooden Leg is a real person. I think it is one of you lot.

[Bullseye]

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 11:20 am  

It's you isn't it? Haven't you got work to do?

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 11:36 am  

Some stirrer on wakey board claiming we've had a letter from RFL advising us to go into admin. Suspect he may have got his clubs mixed up if rumours going round last few weeks have any legs.

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 11:45 am  

At the time that OK would/would not sell his shares to M.Moore then my reading between the lines was that we entered admin as a way to get OK out of the club and get the new owners in place. Now whether the RFL sanctioned this or not is a good question. The fact that we put out a statement saying that NO points would be deducted could mean the above poster is correct!!!!!

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 11:58 am  

mat wrote:

Some stirrer on wakey board claiming we've had a letter from RFL advising us to go into admin. Suspect he may have got his clubs mixed up if rumours going round last few weeks have any legs.

You might have misinterpreted what he meant.
I don't for one second think it is true, but the guy on the Wakey board meant that we have proof (the letter) that Mark Moore/Marc Green were advised to put the club in admin back when we did so at the start of the year.
It's not a letter telling us to do it now if that's what you thought!

Anyway, like I said, can't see it being true for one second.

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 12:33 pm  

Nothus wrote:

You might have misinterpreted what he meant.
I don't for one second think it is true, but the guy on the Wakey board meant that we have proof (the letter) that Mark Moore/Marc Green were advised to put the club in admin back when we did so at the start of the year.
It's not a letter telling us to do it now if that's what you thought!

Anyway, like I said, can't see it being true for one second.

That would certainly make more sense. Doubt it's true too but if club did have a letter from governing body advising them to enter admin and stating no points deduction would be applied, then could that letter be basis of our appeal I.e RFL moving goalposts after we've followed their advice?.

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 12:40 pm  

If that were the case, there is absolutely no way Mark Moore wouldn't have mentioned it during his rant after the 6 point penalty was announced.
He never mentioned any such letter iirc, so I doubt said letter exists.

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 1:03 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

I don't believe Wooden Leg is a real person. I think it is one of you lot.

He is real, but he doesn't have a real wooden leg. Like that Heather Mills.

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 3:30 pm  

Nothus wrote:

If that were the case, there is absolutely no way Mark Moore wouldn't have mentioned it during his rant after the 6 point penalty was announced.
He never mentioned any such letter iirc, so I doubt said letter exists.

Is this a different letter to the one Wakefield wrote?