: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:31 am
rhinoms wrote:
...
IF you look at who was around and on the top of their game when fielden got his award then it's safe to say that there were candidates who'd done better both domestically in a harder league and on the international stage.
It is not "safe to say" at all. FYI I watch a lot of league, including all the NRL games. I watched them that year too. And of course I watched Fielden every week. Now, there were an awful lot of good forwards in the world, but the only point that I made was that Fielden was "ARGUABLY the best forward in the world". As he was the official holder of that title, a fact which you seemingly didn't know, I reckon that only troll, or maybe if you
did know, a dolt would say it was not "arguable".
Of course, argument about who is/was the best is the lifeblood of rugby discussions, and I wouldn't have it any other way, but all YOU posted in your reply directly to me was:
which I believe means that your "argument" about my statement, that Fielden was "arguably" the best forward at that time, was
"Laughing My Fscking Ar
.se Off"
rhinoms wrote:
...Again you resort to petty insults because i don't agree with your opinion or that of an award received by a bulls player(which has nothing to do with my opinion).
But you don't consider that this may be because you started it?
rhinoms wrote:
...Like i said previous there's no doubt he was the best over here but imo not better than the ones i listed that is of course if i'm allowed an opinion.
Ahh, yes, and indeed in your LATER posts you did advance an opinion! You see, you can do it. And you can also see that if you'd done it in the first place, instead of being so rude, you wouldn't have got back what you got.
As pointed out, it's not "disagreement" which I took issue with, it was your post, which
was a plain and simple troll. And, of course, you are well known fro regularly trolling on RAB. Or do you deny that?
You know the funniest thing, because you won't understand it, is that you yourself, in this very thread, did a bit of pot/kettle calling, when you replied to someone else:-
rhinoms wrote:
...
I like the way you've proved your argument and put your well thought out response into words
If you are prepared to think about it, that's exactly what you did yourself: "LMFAO". Remember?