Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:14 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

Although he did win the game for you today.

Will all those who were last week saying he was rubbish, never rated him, he was only good behind the dominant Bulls pack please stand up and apologise

AT LAST a person who knows about talent & skills in Rugby League - I have occasionally mentioned how good Deacon is to the Bulls side & some (idiots) argue with me

Do not hold your breath for any apology matey - us experienced RL people know our stuff

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:15 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

AT LAST a person who knows about talent & skills in Rugby League - I have occasionally mentioned how good Deacon is to the Bulls side & some (idiots) argue with me

Do not hold your breath for any apology matey - us experienced RL people know our stuff

[Bullseye]

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:18 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

AT LAST a person who knows about talent & skills in Rugby League - I have occasionally mentioned how good Deacon is to the Bulls side & some (idiots) argue with me

Do not hold your breath for any apology matey - us experienced RL people know our stuff

You've been quiet lately

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:20 pm  

tigertot wrote:

He was terrible on the radio.

How typical - Radio You need to get a life matey before its too late - those who attend games should comment, but others should shut up

[Bullseye]

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:22 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

:lol: How typical - Radio You need to get a life matey before its too late - those who attend games should comment, but others should shut up

Don't take it to heart hari. Tigertot is no authority on radio, he's a fan of the hairy cornflake FFS!

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:25 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

You've been quiet lately

Sadly that hasn't continued.

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:27 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

You've been quiet lately

Yes Bullseye - very busy building up my business empire & also having to cool it a bit with some other team's site

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:35 pm  

Maccbull_BigBullyBooaza wrote:

I don't subscribe to this "his goal kicking was good but he did nothing else to warrant his inclusion" view. The fact is that Deacon was the difference yesterday because of his goal kicking. It would have been handy if he had been more creative in the middle and kicking on the last but he was integral to us winning the game which is all important.

If it were the grand final and we beat 18 vs 16 because we kicked three from three conversions and they kicked 2 would it really matter how he played during the rest of the game?

If you had a decent scrum half perhaps you wouldn't be in a position where you had to rely on kicks.

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:58 pm  

DILLIGAF wrote:

Sadly that hasn't continued.

Actually Dillidip, I have been missed on this site I have always tried to be honest & unbiased in my comments & views & I will continue to act in this manner because I AM BACK BABY

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:01 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

Actually Dillidip, I have been missed on this site I have always tried to be honest & unbiased in my comments & views & I will continue to act in this manner because I AM BACK BABY

Get back under your bridge.