Re: Ian Watt : Thu Oct 17, 2013 6:56 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

Interesting that after concerts, toe coral lounge and the shop, Mt Watt sees Monster Trucks and a reliance on making the top 8 in 2014 as part of his business plan.

Yeah, because why would the new owners want to do anything that might turn a profit? No, much better to follow London's use of a rich owner. Because if you have a rich owner, it doesn't matter how poor your team is or how poor your attendance is because at the end of every year you'll still have players for the team and a ground to play your fixtures at.... oh wait.... No you won't.

Re: Ian Watt : Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:49 pm  

roofaldo2 wrote:

Yeah, because why would the new owners want to do anything that might turn a profit? No, much better to follow London's use of a rich owner. Because if you have a rich owner, it doesn't matter how poor your team is or how poor your attendance is because at the end of every year you'll still have players for the team and a ground to play your fixtures at.... oh wait.... No you won't.

Interesting to see Bradford Bulls are looking to employ a Food and Beverage Operations Manager....then again, with Mr Whitcut's track record in F&B, it's hardly surprising they're looking at someone else to run that part of the business

Re: Ian Watt : Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:29 pm  

What a fantastic comeback Gutterfax

What a nob head

Which park are we watching London play in next season

What about Regents Park so we can watch you with the rest of the donkeys in the zoo

Re: Ian Watt : Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:42 pm  

roger daly wrote:

What a fantastic comeback Gutterfax

Thank you....I thought so too

roger daly wrote:

What a nob head

Wow...personal insults. Was it something I said? BTW, Knob......it's Knob

roger daly wrote:

Which park are we watching London play in next season

As I have already said, nobody knows.

roger daly wrote:

What about Regents Park so we can watch you with the rest of the donkeys in the zoo

Oh dear....as FAILS go, you should be proud of that valiant attempt at humour.

Re: Ian Watt : Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:15 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

BTW, Knob......it's Knob

A door knob is spelled that way. The other type of nob, the one I think Roger was referring to is spelled without the 'k'.

He was right.

Re: Ian Watt : Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:41 am  

Stul wrote: A door knob is spelled that way. The other type of nob, the one I think Roger was referring to is spelled without the 'k'. He was right. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=knob%20head http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fine fellow&page=2 http://www.internetslang.com/KNOB-meaning-definition.asp Now, before the bell rings and you have to scoot off somewhere else to be schooled by someone else, the Oxford English Dictionary would define me as a person of wealth if I were a "nob". I somehow doubt that was the meaning Roger was intending. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/nob?q=nob love me sideways, even the grammar police are dim oop norf

Stul wrote: A door knob is spelled that way. The other type of nob, the one I think Roger was referring to is spelled without the 'k'. He was right. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=knob%20head http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fine fellow&page=2 http://www.internetslang.com/KNOB-meaning-definition.asp Now, before the bell rings and you have to scoot off somewhere else to be schooled by someone else, the Oxford English Dictionary would define me as a person of wealth if I were a "nob". I somehow doubt that was the meaning Roger was intending. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/nob?q=nob love me sideways, even the grammar police are dim oop norf

Re: Ian Watt : Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:58 am  

gutterfax wrote:

Thank you....I thought so too

Wow...personal insults. Was it something I said? BTW, Knob......it's Knob

As I have already said, nobody knows.

Oh dear....as FAILS go, you should be proud of that valiant attempt at humour.

Well I'm sure if he just repeats it over and over and over and over again then it must become funny. That's how your "jokes" work after all

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Ian Watt : Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:13 am  

I really don't think entering into the semantics about whether you perceive a poster to be a 'knob' or a 'nob' is worthy of this forum. He might be a wind-up merchant but some of you need to get a sense of perspective.

Notice how the incredibly feeble attempts to bait him about the London club have yet to have the slightest impact?

[Bulliac]

Re: Ian Watt : Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:30 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

I really don't think entering into the semantics about whether you perceive a poster to be a 'knob' or a 'nob' is worthy of this forum. He might be a wind-up merchant but some of you need to get a sense of perspective.

Notice how the incredibly feeble attempts to bait him about the London club have yet to have the slightest impact?

Sort of agree, to be fair, but the constant drivel and determination to make spurious comments about anything connected to the club are dragging the forum down. He reminds me of Keith Senior when he played for Leeds - no matter how many times he stood in an off-side position, the mods, sorry referees, never seemed to do anything about it...

Re: Ian Watt : Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:37 pm  

Bulliac wrote:

Sort of agree, to be fair, but the constant drivel and determination to make spurious comments about anything connected to the club are dragging the forum down. He reminds me of Keith Senior when he played for Leeds - no matter how many times he stood in an off-side position, the mods, sorry referees, never seemed to do anything about it...

A very apt comparison