Re: Mullally to Bulls on 1 month loan. : Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:29 pm  

Cripesginger wrote:

He is actually with you week on week. He can be recalled at a weeks notice. A genuine season long loan would prohibit such a recall.

This will almost certainly mean that mullers will not play versus the Giants.

I am sure Bulls fans will be hoping the Giants forwards stay fit and on top form for 2014 !

Bulls website says he can be recalled as part of 24-hour return clause.

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Mullally to Bulls on 1 month loan. : Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:34 pm  

Cripesginger wrote:

He is actually with you week on week. He can be recalled at a weeks notice.

So we no more "have him for the season" that we did when he was on a month by month loan? Just spin then?

[Bulliac]

Re: Mullally to Bulls season long loan. : Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:37 pm  

Rolling loan?

He needs the games and we need him - I'll even go and pick him up every week if it eases the deal..

Re: Mullally to Bulls season long loan. : Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:38 pm  

Isn't that how season loans always work? On a month loan, no recall, but on a season loan there is the option.

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Mullally to Bulls season long loan. : Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:40 pm  

Bulliac wrote:

Rolling loan?

He'll gather no moss so that's one positive.

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Mullally to Bulls season long loan. : Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:43 pm  

AJW wrote:

Isn't that how season loans always work? On a month loan, no recall, but on a season loan there is the option.

Look I may be being thick here but what is the point in a season long loan then? A month by month loan lets you know he's here for 3 or 4 games at a time and can be renewed again and again. A season loan actually makes it far easier to recall him?

Re: Mullally to Bulls season long loan. : Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:50 pm  

That just makes no sense a season long loan should be a season long loan, may as well have him on a month to month basis as pumpetypump said above !!

Re: Mullally to Bulls season long loan. : Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:57 pm  

AJW wrote:

Isn't that how season loans always work? On a month loan, no recall, but on a season loan there is the option.

No, a genuine season long loan would preclude any recall for the whole season (though it could still specify a player cannot play against his registered club)

Re: Mullally to Bulls on 1 month loan. : Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:33 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

So we no more "have him for the season" that we did when he was on a month by month loan? Just spin then?

No, I think you have him for the season providing none of Crabtree, Kopczak or Kaufusi gets a long term injury, which from the lending clubs perspective seems reasonable.

I am not 100% certain but believe the Giants are picking up the entirety of his salary (all parent clubs are doing so for your current monthly loanees). Setting recent fan antipathy aside at club level it seems Giants along with Wire, Wigan and Leeds are on your side.

Re: Mullally to Bulls on 1 month loan. : Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:45 pm  

GiantDee wrote:

No, I think you have him for the season providing none of Crabtree, Kopczak or Kaufusi gets a long term injury, which from the lending clubs perspective seems reasonable.

I am not 100% certain but believe the Giants are picking up the entirety of his salary (all parent clubs are doing so for your current monthly loanees). Setting recent fan antipathy aside at club level it seems Giants along with Wire, Wigan and Leeds are on your side.

Yet we have to produce proof of cash for loans?