Re: Fev Game : Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:30 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

I bet Gingdong would appreciate that Roger.

anyone who think our chairman will turn anyones £18 down is a deluded fool, the ground holds 9k cant see it been that

Re: Fev Game : Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:47 pm  

The Bulls have told the RFL they are confident of getting over 10,000 if it were at Odsal, the RFL have agreed to consider it and reach a decision by Wednesday. They have also told Fev if it gets switched to Odsal and get over 10,000 they will give them a bit of the gate money

Re: Fev Game : Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:55 pm  

roger daly wrote:

The Bulls have told the RFL they are confident of getting over 10,000 if it were at Odsal, the RFL have agreed to consider it and reach a decision by Wednesday. They have also told Fev if it gets switched to Odsal and get over 10,000 they will give them a bit of the gate money

Surely this is a wind up? Its a league fixture. How big the attendance is is irrelevant. Fev have a right to fulfill their home fixture. Particularly with what's at stake.

God the Twitter keyboard warriors really would go into meltdown

Re: Fev Game : Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:13 pm  

Bull Mania wrote:

Surely this is a wind up? Its a league fixture. How big the attendance is is irrelevant. Fev have a right to fulfill their home fixture. Particularly with what's at stake.

God the Twitter keyboard warriors really would go into meltdown

Nope I've heard this too, Fev have agreed to the switch but on the condition that Joe Cobb is referee.

Re: Fev Game : Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:34 am  

You've caught a few with that one Roger

Re: Fev Game : Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:23 am  

Don't the RFL have their own ground that they lease? They should hold it there.

Re: Fev Game : Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:25 am  

Bull Mania wrote:

Surely this is a wind up? Its a league fixture. How big the attendance is is irrelevant. Fev have a right to fulfill their home fixture. Particularly with what's at stake.

God the Twitter keyboard warriors really would go into meltdown

Re: Fev Game : Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:37 am  

Ross hinting that some injured players could be back for Sunday. Having Clark back would be a huge boost

Re: Fev Game : Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:59 am  

Nothus wrote:

Ross hinting that some injured players could be back for Sunday. Having Clark back would be a huge boost

If I had a choice of one or the other, I'd rather Clough was back. Hard worker rather than the impact prop. But ideally both will be fit, as well as Kavanagh. I think those 3 coming back for what is bound to be a battle, would be a bigger boost than Gaskell being fit again.

Re: Fev Game : Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:28 am  

HamsterChops wrote:

If I had a choice of one or the other, I'd rather Clough was back. Hard worker rather than the impact prop. But ideally both will be fit, as well as Kavanagh. I think those 3 coming back for what is bound to be a battle, would be a bigger boost than Gaskell being fit again.

Agreed

Honestly, I can't believe I'm saying this, but I kinda hope Gaskell isn't fit, and therefore any decision about playing him won't be necessary.

He cannot possibly be match fit, and the memory of him desperately trying to get match fit during the MPG last season is still fresh in my mind.

Getting Mitch Clark back would be a boost for the impact off the bench. If he's not 100% I'd honestly settle for Lauaki (again, can't believe I'm saying this...). I think he's been good this last few weeks. OK, he's presumably trying for a new contract, but still, I'd be happy with the impact he's given lately.