Re: carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:49 pm  

ha ha, cue the sob stories.

Bulls are going down the pan and a working man jumps ship to give him a guaranteed wage (at least Hull FC will pay him !)

Run a proper club and players will stay. If you don't they won't. I can't see the problem - properly run clubs don't have these issues.

Re: carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:51 pm  

WHich would explain the massive issues your own club has had over recent years, then.

Re: carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:22 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

WHich would explain the massive issues your own club has had over recent years, then.

Yes of course it does. Has no bearing on this current situation though does it.

Re: carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:34 pm  

Can't miss what I guess you never experienced. If his heart wasn't in it you will be better off with a youngster playing and gaining some experience.

Re: carvell : Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:07 am  

major black wrote:

Yes of course it does. Has no bearing on this current situation though does it.

Absolutely.

And some old hands on here may remember me getting my 'nads chewed off on these forums when I supported Hull FC and its fans some years ago in the face of all the crap about the goalposts and similar incidents? But I stand by everything I said at the time. DO not judge a club, and its fans, by the actions of a stupid minority.

But it was a response to a guy who was taking the moral high ground now, secure in the knowledge that your club now has a wealthy owner and hopefully one who will not tolerate some of the nonsense in the recent past from some staff and players? A couple of years ago, he would not have been able to say what he did.

So, as with you guys, what happened in the past at Bradford should surely have no bearing on the current situation?

Re: carvell : Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:10 am  

Towns88 wrote:

Can't miss what I guess you never experienced. If his heart wasn't in it you will be better off with a youngster playing and gaining some experience.

You seem a very sensible chap? You need to come here more often.

Re: carvell : Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:50 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

Well I hope he gets a career ending injury on Friday. What a twunt.

What a sick comment to make, regardless of the manner of his departure

Re: carvell : Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:24 am  

If Caisley is not involved the Bulls have probably got a winnable action. The Muppets at Sod Hall are a different matter, in allowing a disputed registration and not telling Hull they could be deducted points for playing an illegible player if they lose the court case to the Bulls, they are saying the employment Laws are making the Players untouchable and any contracts worthless!!

Re: carvell : Thu Feb 13, 2014 4:41 am  

Bulls are leaving the matter in the hands of professionals: http://elcons.co.uk/ Love it how we suddenly have so many experts on here who know better. You should apply for the top job with Elcon as clearly they know nothing and would appreciate your expertise. I think it is clear to say that there are some very muddied waters surrounding the case but anything written to Carvell will have been written very much with the legal context in mind. Mind you, after Shudds seemingly got off absolutely scot free even after lying to the RFL's investigator, unless we did somehow win the legal case or reach a deal, I don't expect anything much from any other quarter.

Bulls are leaving the matter in the hands of professionals: http://elcons.co.uk/ Love it how we suddenly have so many experts on here who know better. You should apply for the top job with Elcon as clearly they know nothing and would appreciate your expertise. I think it is clear to say that there are some very muddied waters surrounding the case but anything written to Carvell will have been written very much with the legal context in mind. Mind you, after Shudds seemingly got off absolutely scot free even after lying to the RFL's investigator, unless we did somehow win the legal case or reach a deal, I don't expect anything much from any other quarter.

Re: carvell : Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:51 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: Bulls are leaving the matter in the hands of professionals: http://elcons.co.uk/ Love it how we suddenly have so many experts on here who know better. You should apply for the top job with Elcon as clearly they know nothing and would appreciate your expertise. I think it is clear to say that there are some very muddied waters surrounding the case but anything written to Carvell will have been written very much with the legal context in mind. Mind you, after Shudds seemingly got off absolutely scot free even after lying to the RFL's investigator, unless we did somehow win the legal case or reach a deal, I don't expect anything much from any other quarter. The point is the club are making the right noises. As for using employment law specialists everyone this side of the river hull knows that ten minutes on Google is enough to pass the cipd exams

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: Bulls are leaving the matter in the hands of professionals: http://elcons.co.uk/ Love it how we suddenly have so many experts on here who know better. You should apply for the top job with Elcon as clearly they know nothing and would appreciate your expertise. I think it is clear to say that there are some very muddied waters surrounding the case but anything written to Carvell will have been written very much with the legal context in mind. Mind you, after Shudds seemingly got off absolutely scot free even after lying to the RFL's investigator, unless we did somehow win the legal case or reach a deal, I don't expect anything much from any other quarter. The point is the club are making the right noises. As for using employment law specialists everyone this side of the river hull knows that ten minutes on Google is enough to pass the cipd exams