: Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:38 pm  

Sam ran in against Wakey last season aswell, I don't think he likes them. Can't blame he really though can you, they are a set of clowns that are getting to big for their boots.

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:13 pm  

dholli12 wrote:

Don't Demetriou and Jeffries own a business together or something??

They are big mates but I dont think that matters on the pitch

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:16 pm  

DILLIGAF wrote:

I gotta agree, Sam stood out a mile as he ran in and seemed to throw a kind of diving punch. It looked awesome, but my first reaction was "he's in bother".

I gotta agree, that was an amazing punch and if it had hit it would have probably knocked him out. Throwing the punch at Scruton was unnecessary though, he was getting a big prop forward off of one of the smallest players on the pitch. Are the highlights online?

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:17 pm  

Terry Monster wrote:

Sam ran in against Wakey last season aswell, I don't think he likes them. Can't blame he really though can you, they are a set of clowns that are getting to big for their boots.

yes you are right. ran in ,did exactly the same thing last season. swung a punch like an 11 year old in the playground. completely missed both times. have to do better with the big boys. the only real time you noticed him on the pitch. if you didn't have menzies , celtic would be above you.

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:23 pm  

MR BROWN wrote:

if you didn't have menzies , celtic would be above you.

You really know what you're talking about. Sam would get in any team in the league.

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:25 pm  

MR BROWN wrote:

if you didn't have menzies , celtic would be above you.

Oh and if Wakefield didn't have Atkins they'd be outside the play-offs

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:27 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

:lol: You really know what you're talking about. Sam would get in any team in the league.

who said he wouldn't

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:28 pm  

MR BROWN wrote:

who said he wouldn't

Well, have to do better with the big boys. Then implying that Menzies is the sole reason we aren't bottom sort of says that you think Burgess isn't a very good player.

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:29 pm  

MR BROWN wrote:

who said he wouldn't

Was thinking the same thing TBH. He could have thought of someone better than Atkins!!!

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:32 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

Well, have to do better with the big boys. Then implying that Menzies is the sole reason we aren't bottom sort of says that you think Burgess isn't a very good player.

no, i mean if he keeps throwing punches and hitting nothing sooner or later he will get flattened. as far as menzies is concerned, imo he has been your stand out player this season, and to lesser extent semi and bj