Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:08 pm  

tigertot wrote:

Get back under your bridge.

Talking to Dill, not Dipstick - so keep off my posts Tigs baby

You are not really a match for me are you Tigs

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:10 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

I have been missed on this site

Not by me. As previously said, I find your routine incredibly boring as the joke went sour after about the second post.

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:19 pm  

DILLIGAF wrote:

Not by me. As previously said, I find you incredibly boring as the joke went sour after about the second post.

SO STOP replying Dippy - not interested in your comments, but you are obviously interested in mine

I have never been having a joke about Deacon - merely stating the fact that he was the mastermind behind our seaons of success !!

Sorry zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:26 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

SO STOP replying Dippy - not interested in your comments, but you are obviously interested in mine

I have never been having a joke about Deacon - merely stating the fact that he was the mastermind behind our seaons of success !!

Sorry zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

That's some good gear hari, get me a few ounces.

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:54 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

not interested in your comments

And anyone with a sense of humour isn't interested in yours. You stop posting (or at least make them sensible instead of this Deacon "joke"), I'll stop replying. Deal?

Re: Paul Deacon is rubbish ? : Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:14 pm  

DILLIGAF wrote:

And anyone with a sense of humour isn't interested in yours. You stop posting (or at least make them sensible instead of this Deacon "joke"), I'll stop replying. Deal?

Err ............ ok then

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:13 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

:lol: How typical - Radio You need to get a life matey before its too late - those who attend games should comment, but others should shut up

he was terrible at the game too. he's been terrible for a while. he gets in the way of set moves. id rather play with 12

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:15 pm  

tigertot wrote:

If you had a decent scrum half perhaps you wouldn't be in a position where you had to rely on kicks.

Bang on!

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:30 pm  

tigertot wrote:

If you had a decent scrum half perhaps you wouldn't be in a position where you had to rely on kicks.

the stand off/ second row/ Centre combos would have more time, be under less pressure and hopefully make more mistakes if we shipped the ball quicker

We ship the ball quicker it opens up more options for a scrum half with a turn of pace to exploit and also for the dummy half

A couple of seasons ago I suggested Robinson, I don't think he would have broke the bank either

I know some don't like Deacs being picked on but he's the main weak link. Langley needs to continue with more of the same on Sunday before his recent performances are forgiven

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:37 pm  

Sledger McNamara conceded that his captain is not yet his old self and will sit down this week to work out what needed to done to get him back on track.

Sledger McNamara conceded that his captain is not yet his old self and will sit down this week to work out what needed to done to get him back on track.