Re: Marc Green : Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:07 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

Not at all angry whatsoever.

That's good. Am I forgiven for having to re register then?

Re: Marc Green : Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:11 am  

Top House Lad wrote:

That's good. Am I forgiven for having to re register then?

Nope, frankly unforgiveable
Welcome back btw. I suspect our new Peter Hood is also an old hand.

Re: Marc Green : Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:15 am  

Duckman wrote:

Nope, frankly unforgiveable
Welcome back btw. I suspect our new Peter Hood is also an old hand.

Re: Marc Green : Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:17 am  

Peter Hood wrote:

I hope you reserve some of the above when it transpires that the winding up order has only been deferred and still needs paying in full.

Wouldn't it be nice to seek immunity from the disingenuous.

Genuine question, is the London gazette being disingenuous when it stated the winding up order was dismissed on 9/12/15, not deferred?

Re: Marc Green : Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:19 am  

Top House Lad wrote:

That's good. Am I forgiven for having to re register then?

I cannot remember suggesting that having to re-register was unforgiveable TBH. And, if I did then that would be a silly thing to say wouldn't it?

Perhaps if you show me where I said this I will retract the statement and make a full apology to you.

Re: Marc Green : Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:32 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

It is just a shame that people hide behind aliases.

Not got the bottle to say it as it is under your normal (or ex) user name.

This is getting really silly but it seemed to me that this statement inferred that I had changed my username in order to hide my normal user name through a lack of bottle. Not the case. I don't really care if you apologise or not really.

Re: Marc Green : Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:44 am  

Top House Lad wrote:

This is getting really silly but it seemed to me that this statement inferred that I had changed my username in order to hide my normal user name through a lack of bottle. Not the case. I don't really care if you apologise or not really.

So I didn't suggest that at all then?

Thanks for clarifying this.

Hopefully now you will start contributing to the board now that you have gotten all this off your chest.

Re: Marc Green : Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:50 am  

Duckman wrote:

Genuine question, is the London gazette being disingenuous when it stated the winding up order was dismissed on 9/12/15, not deferred?

Gazette is obviously lying and only he knows the real truth. same as way he squirmed out of being caught out about mistaking methane for mustard gas and hes now stuck with claiming theres chemical weapons buried under terraces.

Re: Marc Green : Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:23 pm  

Hmm. Which do I rely on. In the blue corner, we have an off-cummed'un with the natty alias of Peter Hood, trolling a forum and claiming one thing.

In the red corner, we have The Gazette, the UK's official public record since 1665.

Which is likely to be the most reliable source of information?

It is obviously a close call, but I'm gonna roll with The Gazette.

Re: Marc Green : Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:45 pm  

Top House Lad wrote:

This is getting really silly but it seemed to me that this statement inferred that I had changed my username in order to hide my normal user name through a lack of bottle. Not the case. I don't really care if you apologise or not really.

Mind if I ask what your old username was? Just out of curiosity.