Re: New signing : Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:17 am  

Guys don't lynch me if I'm wrong hahaha!

Re: New signing : Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:20 am  

Nothus wrote:

Guys don't lynch me if I'm wrong hahaha!

I said it first on the page before!

So yeah, lynch Nothus if he's wrong.

Re: New signing : Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:21 am  

Ok

1. Retired
2. Full Back
3. Will divide opinion

Kevin Locke

Re: New signing : Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:21 am  

I woudln't be getting your hopes up for Minichiello.

I don't want to name what I was told, purely because I don't know it to be correct and I was told in confidence. The bloke who told me is usually correct with what he hears though.

And if he is correct, even I don't know what the wavelength thing is about, so either it's claptrap or a very obscure clue. The name I've been told certainly doesn't have initials of AM, FM, MW etc.

Re: New signing : Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:23 am  

Nothus wrote:

Guys don't lynch me if I'm wrong hahaha!

I wouldn't be dissapointed with that signing but we have more than enough props. It's got to be a fullback or scrum half.

Re: New signing : Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:25 am  

HamsterChops wrote:

I woudln't be getting your hopes up for Minichiello.

I don't want to name what I was told, purely because I don't know it to be correct and I was told in confidence. The bloke who told me is usually correct with what he hears though.

And if he is correct, even I don't know what the wavelength thing is about, so either it's claptrap or a very obscure clue. The name I've been told certainly doesn't have initials of AM, FM, MW etc.

Would the player you think it is be on a big wage? I've seen a few commentd suggesting that Marc Green will have had to shell a bit out for him?

Re: New signing : Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:26 am  

Sensei-Bull wrote:

Would the player you think it is be on a big wage? I've seen a few commentd suggesting that Marc Green will have had to shell a bit out for him?

Honestly wouldn't have a clue. Nothing like I would expect Minichiello to be on, but I'd have thought he'd command more than likes of Thomas and Campbell.

Re: New signing : Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:27 am  

hindle xiii wrote:

I said it first on the page before!

So yeah, lynch Nothus if he's wrong.

Oh yeah you did haha! Ok all Hindle's fault from now on

Re: New signing : Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:28 am  

Well Gledhill's tweet yesterday of MG opening the cheque book has disappeared.

Hamster - would the signing "raise eyebrows" as Ross suggested?

Re: New signing : Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 am  

Bull Mania wrote:

Well Gledhill's tweet yesterday of MG opening the cheque book has disappeared.

Hamster - would the signing "raise eyebrows" as Ross suggested?

Again, I don't know for definite what I've been told is correct.

Personally, it didn't raise my eyebrows. But it's certainly unexpected, which is perhaps what Ross means.

(Well, unexpected before everyone started trying to guess!)