Re: Points deduction poll : Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:57 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

The summary is not the whole story, there was no link to "company failure". They had to complete their 2014 fixtures. Of course if the club went completely tits it might end up that they couldn't complete their fixtures, so in some circumstances it could amount to the same thing, but it doesn't necessarily follow. I see no reason to think the Bulls won't complete their fixtures so that makes it to me a grey area..

I think you will find it is quite clear that Ok had to repay central funding if OK Bulls suffered an insolvency event within 2 years. This was key to funds that were only to be paid in year 2 of the licence term being brought forward into year 1 at OK's request.

Re: Points deduction poll : Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:04 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Nope. Wrong.

I think you'll find I am absolutely correct

Neither will the GDP of Botswana. Can you tell us who said it did or would, though?

You seemed to be having a difficulty with establishing whether or not the RFL was a creditor. I was simply helping your lack of understanding by providing a background as to why the RFL lodged the notice with David Wilson

Wrong. In specific circumstances OKB did indeed have liability.

Which specific circumstances?
Any luck with this £1m investment claim yet?

Bless.

Dear boy, come back when you actually know something, instead of continuing your incessant & childish trolling. Leave it to the grown ups who have dealt with the parties concerned and know what has gone on. Run along, now.

Re: Points deduction poll : Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:07 pm  

My monies now on the "dark knight"

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Points deduction poll : Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:22 pm  

Is it just my smart phone or is the curious way leaguedweeb responds within quotes almost impossible to understand?

Re: Points deduction poll : Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:31 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

Is it just my smart phone or is the curious way leaguedweeb responds within quotes almost impossible to understand?

It could be worse. You could be able to read it. It really is dull.

Re: Points deduction poll : Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:34 pm  

mystic eddie wrote:

It could be worse. You could be able to read it. It really is dull.

Says the man who doesn't even know appeal panel members are from a company that tendered & won a bid to provide legal services to the RFL as far back as 2005. Laughable.

Re: Points deduction poll : Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:42 pm  

LeagueDweeb wrote:

Says the man who doesn't even know appeal panel members are from a company that tendered & won a bid to provide legal services to the RFL as far back as 2005. Laughable.

Re: Points deduction poll : Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:49 pm  

LeagueDweeb wrote:

I think you will find it is quite clear that Ok had to repay central funding if OK Bulls suffered an insolvency event within 2 years.

I don't need to try to "find" it as I know it wasn't that. You are just making it up (again).

LeagueDweeb wrote:

You seemed to be having a difficulty with establishing whether or not the RFL was a creditor. I was simply helping your lack of understanding by providing a background as to why the RFL lodged the notice with David Wilson

Another of your fails. The only reason a claim is lodged in an administration by a creditor is because they claim to be owed money. It's not hard. There is no other reason.

LeagueDweeb wrote:

Which specific circumstances?

It's complicated. I note you don't know, though.

LeagueDweeb wrote:

Any luck with this £1m investment claim yet?

Yes. I understand much will be revealed shortly.

LeagueDweeb wrote:

YDear boy, come back when you actually know something, instead of continuing your incessant & childish trolling. Leave it to the grown ups who have dealt with the parties concerned and know what has gone on. Run along, now.

How embarrassing for you. All I will remark is that one of us speaks from a position of ignorance and has been frequently shown up and corrected, and it isn't me.

You're Walter Mitty. Why, you even claim, from your self-styled position of "insider knowledge", that OK isn't suing MM and RW! I leave it at this: if you actually had dealt with any of those parties, then you would know about the litigation, and wouldn't have repeatedly made such a fool of yourself by vociferously denying that OK has sued anyone. He has. Your bluff is called. You are a fantasist.

Re: Points deduction poll : Wed Jun 04, 2014 10:48 pm  

Looks like its decided its had enough of being comprehensively battered, and wants the escape route of getting banned. At least it has shown its true colours at last.

Can some mod kindly oblige it, and put it out of its misery? Doubtless it will morph into some new form of infection in due course.

Re: Points deduction poll : Wed Jun 04, 2014 10:50 pm  

LeagueDweeb wrote:

Lots of bad words - Edited for the sake of our children (He even used the "C" word! )

This post is better than your usual tripe