Re: Jarrod Sanmut : Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:38 pm  

Peter Hood wrote:

Jimmy has already met him and told him he's not needed. Sorry to end the dream.

I'm genuinely interested to know how you know this? Would you care to elucidate.

Re: Jarrod Sanmut : Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:52 pm  

Peter Hood wrote:

Jimmy has already met him and told him he's not needed. Sorry to end the dream.

First time i've heard of a coach meeting a player to tell him he's not wanted...

Although FWIW, i don't think we'll see Sammut in a Bulls shirt

[Bulliac]

Re: Jarrod Sanmut : Tue Dec 15, 2015 11:31 am  

Bull Mania wrote:

First time i've heard of a coach meeting a player to tell him he's not wanted...

Although FWIW, i don't think we'll see Sammut in a Bulls shirt

Yeah, he met him at a motorway service station, at midnight, with his agent, and all were wearing dark glasses and Santa outfits, so that only the most observant of journalists, fans or neigh sayers could could possibly spot them..
Though I think the one with the dark beard may have given them away.

Re: Jarrod Sanmut : Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:39 pm  

Jimmy also told everyone else at that service station he wasn't signing them.

Re: Jarrod Sanmut : Fri Dec 18, 2015 9:29 am  

Not in a service station but these "meeting" seem to be cropping up. I mean, it might be perfectly innocent but why was Ferres having a somewhat "interesting" discussion with Glenn Morrison when Jimmy was on England duty? It must be said that whatever Mr F was showing Glenn on his laptop was certainly of great interest to the big Aussie.

Re: Jarrod Sanmut : Fri Dec 18, 2015 9:37 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

Not in a service station but these "meeting" seem to be cropping up. I mean, it might be perfectly innocent but why was Ferres having a somewhat "interesting" discussion with Glenn Morrison when Jimmy was on England duty? It must be said that whatever Mr F was showing Glenn on his laptop was certainly of great interest to the big Aussie.

Probably trying to flog him Etu or one of the other players highly unlikely to get a game this year but contracted for a season too long.

Either that or a funny cat video.

Re: Jarrod Sanmut : Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:22 am  

Sorry to disappoint but they were watching the horse racing, in which they had a shared interest

Re: Jarrod Sanmut : Fri Dec 18, 2015 12:46 pm  

HamsterChops wrote:

Probably trying to flog him Etu or one of the other players highly unlikely to get a game this year but contracted for a season too long.

Either that or a funny cat video.

Given the guy was on loan at Dewsbury at the end of the season, why would he need to be shown video of a player he's already see train and play?

Re: Jarrod Sanmut : Fri Dec 18, 2015 1:32 pm  

roofaldo2 wrote:

Given the guy was on loan at Dewsbury at the end of the season, why would he need to be shown video of a player he's already see train and play?

To be honest I didn't realise the cat was registered, let alone on loan terms.

You get that I wasn't being serious in that first post, right?

Re: Jarrod Sanmut : Mon Dec 21, 2015 1:20 pm  

HamsterChops wrote:

To be honest I didn't realise the cat was registered, let alone on loan terms.

You get that I wasn't being serious in that first post, right?

Personally I find it curious that a hamster was joke about a cat.

It will eat you.