Re: Salford and the Salary Cap : Fri Apr 08, 2016 9:42 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

That's great, did you work that out all by yourself, or did someone tell you?

You didn't notice, then? We have no need or wish to "come to terms with it", cos we're not, er, in it any more. Do keep up.

At the risk of being lambasted by your good self FA, he was refering to the middle eights being she!!te not SL. HTH

Re: Salford and the Salary Cap : Fri Apr 08, 2016 9:56 am  

chissitt wrote:

At the risk of being lambasted by your good self FA, he was refering to the middle eights being she!!te not SL. HTH

If so, maybe they should have clarified that then?

Re: Salford and the Salary Cap : Fri Apr 08, 2016 10:27 am  

TBF I think Lampy was referring to the structure and that Salford could be found guilty deducted points but then start the middle 8s on zero effectively meaning they get away with it. Don't see what people are getting so worked up about.

Re: Salford and the Salary Cap : Fri Apr 08, 2016 10:43 am  

Bull Mania wrote:

TBF I think Lampy was referring to the structure and that Salford could be found guilty deducted points but then start the middle 8s on zero effectively meaning they get away with it. Don't see what people are getting so worked up about.

I don't think anyone is getting "worked up" about anything? The Aardvarks' blood pressure is always far too high so that was quite a cool and composed post IMO.

Re: Salford and the Salary Cap : Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:29 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

If so, maybe they should have clarified that then?

I can see that somebody with limited intelligence struggling to understand, no offence to you Ed but FA comes across as somebody what's at least half a page in front of you in that particular field, and let's face it my post was to him and I thought it might just be an error on his part which did not need any further explanation.
Sorry if I've touched a nerve and caused you any embarrassment but if I might be so bold as to offer some advice it would be simply don't jump into an adults conversation without fully understanding the simplest of posts.

Re: Salford and the Salary Cap : Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:34 am  

You can tell when FA is vexed because he starts multi-quoting.
Any time you see the dreaded FA multi-quote, you should just run for the hills tbh

Re: Salford and the Salary Cap : Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:36 am  

chissitt wrote:

I can see that somebody with limited intelligence struggling to understand, no offence to you Ed but FA comes across as somebody what's at least half a page in front of you in that particular field, and let's face it my post was to him and I thought it might just be an error on his part which did not need any further explanation.
Sorry if I've touched a nerve and caused you any embarrassment but if I might be so bold as to offer some advice it would be simply don't jump into an adults conversation without fully understanding the simplest of posts.

Dear me.

Being accused of having limited intelligence by a Wakefield fan is tantamount to be called a bad parent by Kate and Gerry McCann.

[Bullseye]

Re: Salford and the Salary Cap : Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:38 am  

You are Frankie Boyle and I claim my £5 (Scottish).

Re: Salford and the Salary Cap : Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:41 am  

Bullseye wrote:

You are Frankie Boyle and I claim my £5 (Scottish).

We have dead flashy Australian style plastic fivers up here now Bullseye. You would like them.

Shame they do not work in supermarket self scan thingys but cool nonetheless!

Re: Salford and the Salary Cap : Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:56 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

Dear me.

Being accused of having limited intelligence by a Wakefield fan is tantamount to be called a bad parent by Kate and Gerry McCann.

Ed the reference to people with limited intelligence was a generalisation of the situation to those not up to the standard required to converse with FA, please forgive me if I gave you the impression you might fit into that list.
Btw your analogy is proof of that, I think were done here